Special Events: Identifying Legal Issues – Part 1

Acres of rolling hills covered in fruit-covered vines are an idyllic setting for large gatherings and special events. But, for wineries, there are a host of legal concerns that must be addressed or they could lose their license or even be subject to criminal prosecution.

ARE YOU ALLOWED TO HAVE THE EVENT?

Whether it is a hosted event that is open to the public or a private event, like a wedding or anniversary party, the threshold question is whether the winery is even permitted to hold the event.

Zoning Laws

Zoning laws vary dramatically, not only state-to-state, but even among cities and counties within a state. Most, however, have some limitation on the number and/or size of special events. Wineries need to know how their jurisdiction defines a “special event” and what restrictions are in place. For example, in Placer County, California, a winery is required to have one parking space for every 2.5 attendees of a promotional event.

In Maryland, for any promotional event after 6 p.m., a winery must file a notice with the Comptroller’s office at least 14 days in advance; only 12 such events per year are permitted. Within Maryland, Montgomery County is more restrictive: only 9 days of events per calendar year in an agricultural zone or two special events in a residential zone. Additional events require conditional use approval by a hearing examiner.

Even within a jurisdiction, different rules may apply to different properties. When a winery first applies for permission to operate at a specific location, it is not uncommon for the local zoning board to negotiate certain restrictions on the property, including the number of events, the maximum number of people at an event, what type of entertainment and/or food may be present, etc.

These zoning laws must be taken seriously. Royal Oaks Vineyard & Winery in Lebanon, Pennsylvania opened for business in June 2017 and soon began holding events such as open mic nights, paint and sip nights, and terrarium parties. Two months later, the North Cornwall Township issued a cease and desist order, contending that the accessory building on the property was only approved to be used for the display and sale of wine. The order forbid the winery from having indoor and outdoor recorded music, live music, open mic nights, terrarium parties, paint and wine nights, private dinner events, or a variety of other activities. Bill Hartmann, the owner of the winery, says he is not even allowed to play a radio inside the building under the order. He is appealing the decision, but it is a lengthy process and in the meantime, the Township’s restrictions are hurting his business. “Most people think we’re closed,” he said.

Limitations in Leases and Deeds

For wineries that do not own their properties, another source of restrictions on events may be their lease. Common terms include the number of events that may be held on the property, the days and times that the events may be held, the number of people allowed to attend, the portion of the property that may be used for the events, etc. Sometimes a landlord will require advance notice and/or the right to approve or disapprove a proposed event. The default clauses in many commercial leases are harsh and wineries would do well to avoid even the appearance of violating the terms to avoid sometimes draconian remedies.

Even for those who own their properties, there may be easements or restrictive covenants that are attached to the land and restrict certain activities. For example, if the winery shares a privately owned access road with other properties, there may be limitations on the number of vehicles allowed on the road. In order to preserve the quiet character of a rural area, a restrictive covenant may prohibit the use of amplified music outdoors. Owners should check their deeds for any limitations that may be in place.

Noise Ordinances

Noise ordinances may be another source of legal trouble. Local rules may govern the number of people allowed to attend an event, whether music is permitted, whether that music may be amplified, the maximum decibel level, and during what hours the event may be held.

Guy Fieri, one of The Food Network’s most famous celebrity chefs, bought a five acre vineyard in Sonoma County, California in 2012. But, when he applied to open a 10,000 case winery and taproom, he met with some unexpected resistance. Even though the application specifically indicated that no amplified music would be involved, the neighborhood was concerned about possible noise, traffic, and the spectacle surrounding the 14 events per year Fieri planned for the space. More than 150 residents attended his zoning hearing to protest his application. In the end, the planning commission voted 5-0 to deny his permit.

License Restrictions

Finally, the type of license held by the winery may dictate the kind of events it may hold. For example, in California, holders of a type 02 winegrower’s license may conduct Winemaker’s Dinners or provide food and wine free of charge to consumers at Invitation-Only events, provided certain conditions are met. But, holders of a type 17/20 license (e.g., custom-crush clients) may not conduct these events.

RESPONSIBILITIES AT THE EVENT

Determining that a winery may hold an event is only the beginning. Local laws also dictate who the winery may serve, what it may serve, and what activities are allowed.

Who May Be Served

Once again, these laws are very state and locality-specific. For example, while every state prohibits serving alcohol to a person under the age of 21 or a person who is perceived to be intoxicated, some go much further.

Maryland’s alcoholic beverage code, §6-309(a) provides that a winery “may not allow on-premises consumption or possession of alcoholic beverages by an individual under the age of 21 years, regardless of who purchased or obtained the alcoholic beverages.” The code, therefore, puts an affirmative duty on the licensee to monitor alcohol consumption on the entire property, not just the taproom. This can be challenging for wineries with large grounds where people tend to picnic.

Virginia Code §4.1-304.A. prohibits the sale of alcoholic beverages to a person the licensee knows or has reason to believe is interdicted. Interdiction is a legal process in which the Commonwealth declares a person to be a “habitual drunkard” or convicted of driving under the influence. Tennessee Code §57-4-203(c)(1) prohibits selling or furnishing any alcoholic beverage to a person who is “known to be insane or mentally defective” or to any person who is “known to habitually drink alcoholic beverages to excess, or …known to be an habitual user of narcotics.” Violation of this law is a criminal misdemeanor.

What May Be Served

In order to draw a broader customer base, wineries will sometimes serve drinks other than the wine they produce. Here too, the winery must be cautious. California Code §23358(5)(b) allows a winery to serve to guests at a private event not open to the public, wines, beers, and brandies, regardless of source, so long as those products not produced by or for the winery are purchased by the winery from a licensed wholesaler. In New York, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law §76 allows a winery to sell wines manufactured by the licensee or “any New York state labelled wine.”

Maryland alcoholic beverage Code §6-308(b) provides that the “license holder may not allow an individual to consume on the licensed premises an alcoholic beverage that is not purchased on the premises from the license holder.” Thus, if a wedding party wants to have a champagne toast or wants to serve wine not produced by the host winery to its guests, the licensee must purchase the wine from a licensed wholesaler and sell it to the wedding party. This law can also be tricky with regard to picnickers. Though quite rude, it is not uncommon for people bringing a picnic lunch to a winery to bring an outside wine with them. If a Maryland winery allows this practice, it is in violation of the law.

What Activities Are Allowed

As noted above, many local laws govern the use of live music or the number of people attending an event. But, there are many other laws dealing with very specific issues of which the winery must be aware. New York’s alcoholic beverage control law §106, for example, goes into fairly graphic detail about parts of the human body that a winery may not allow customers to display on the premises. That same section of New York law also provides that “[n]o retail licensee for on-premises consumption shall suffer or permit any contest or promotion which endangers the health, safety, and welfare of any person with dwarfism.” While these laws may seem obscure, the fact is that a winery has to ask a lot of questions of guests looking to book private events.

SUMMARY

Because state laws vary so significantly, it would be impossible to identify every legal hurdle faced by wineries that host special events. But, the issues discussed above should get owners thinking about the types of issues they may need to address. For advice relating to a specific situation, consultation with an attorney is strongly recommended. Part 2 of this article, which will appear in the July/August 2018 issue, will discuss various types of events and the legal issues they raise.

Brian Kaider is a principal of KaiderLaw, an intellectual property law firm with extensive experience in the craft beverage industry. He has represented clients from the smallest of start-up breweries to Fortune 500 corporations in the navigation of regulatory requirements, drafting and negotiating contracts, prosecuting trademark and patent applications, and complex commercial litigation.
bkaider@kaiderlaw.com
(240) 308-8032

Special Events: Identifying Legal Issues – Part 2

By Brian Kaider, Esq.

Special events are a valuable source of supplemental income for wineries, but they also present a variety of legal concerns, which if not properly addressed may have significant consequences. In the first part of this article, we discussed limitations on holding special events as well as the winery’s responsibilities at such events. In this second part, we will discuss various types of events and the specific issues they raise.

Weddings and Family Gatherings

Vineyards provide an attractive backdrop for weddings, family reunions, and company retreats. Many wineries also have indoor event space perfect for receptions and other gatherings. While visiting a winery recently, I spoke with the owner who told me the following story.

One Saturday afternoon, she was in the tasting room, which was about half full at the time. Suddenly, the room filled with people in suits and dresses and in walked a bride and groom followed by an entourage of groomsmen, bride’s maids, a photographer, and a videographer. As the owner approached the bridal couple, she noticed two people in the parking lot unloading a wedding cake from a catering truck. When she finally cut through the commotion to ask the bride and groom if she could help them, the bride matter-of-factly said that they were holding their wedding reception there. After an uncomfortable and somewhat heated conversation, the owner and the couple reached an agreement that they could use the winery’s event space, which had not been booked for that day.

While things worked out in this case and everyone was happy in the end, many things could have gone badly. Because arrangements had not been made in advance, the winery had no idea how many people were attending this reception or whether they would be in violation of fire code restrictions. Depending on the jurisdiction, the reception may have been considered a “special event” and required a permit to be obtained in advance. If food was provided to the guests, some states require that it be provided by a properly licensed and permitted caterer. These are only a few examples.

When a winery agrees to host an event, it is granting a license to use the property. It is extremely important to negotiate the exact terms of the event in advance through a license agreement. At a minimum, the license should include: a clear identification of the parties, including addresses; a description of the portion of the premises the licensee is permitted to use; the number of attendees allowed; the specific time frame of the license including circumstances under which that time frame will be cut short; payment terms; the responsibilities of each party, including who will provide various services and amenities; and provisions that the licensee will monitor its guests alcohol consumption, prevent guests from driving intoxicated, and be liable for any damages to the premises incurred during the event.

Additionally, the license should identify the specific purpose and actions allowed under the license. For example, some jurisdictions have laws about what parts of the human body may not be exposed on a licensee’s premises. If the purpose of the event is a bachelor/bachelorette party, certain forms of “entertainment” may violate these laws. If the licensee wants to have a live band or dancing at the event, some jurisdictions, such as Washington State, require the winery to obtain a permit from the local government.

For events such as a wedding, where it may be the bride and groom who contract with the winery, it is also a good idea to have a designated liaison from the licensee, who is not the primary focus of the event. If there is an issue with a guest being rowdy or intoxicated, it is much easier for the winery to approach “Uncle Fred” to deal with the issue than it is to bother the bride during the father-daughter dance.

Passport Events

In areas where there are a lot of wineries near one another, “passport” or “wine trail” events are very popular. These can take many forms, but commonly, customers purchase access to the event, which may take place over the course of a few days, weeks, or even a year. With the purchase, the customer gets a passport and/or map and sometimes a souvenir wine glass. They then go to each winery associated with the event and present the passport, often getting it stamped. Benefits of the passport may include free tastings, discounts on purchases, or the opportunity to enter a drawing for prizes when the passport is completed. The events are generally marketed and coordinated through a third party, such as a winegrowers association.

Wineries interested in organizing or participating in these events should check their local law to avoid any possible violations. Laws vary state-to-state in terms of what may be included in the purchase of the passport (free tastings or only discounts) and who may benefit from the sales. In California, for example, a third-party organizer of a passport event can only sell access to the experiences or activities, which the wineries must provide under their existing licenses. The organizer may not receive any portion of proceeds from the sale of wine, because that would effectively be selling alcohol without a license.

Most states have laws about how contests, drawings, or sweepstakes must be operated, including; how they may be advertised and what words or phrases may be used, how the drawing is to be conducted, and what records relating to the contest must be maintained and for how long. If the winery is in any way involved in the planning or execution of the contest, it must abide by these laws.

Invitation-Only

Invitation-only events generate a lot of interest and help build brand reputation and loyalty, but they come with a lot of rules and wineries should check their local regulations before planning such an event. As a threshold matter, the winery should determine if it is even allowed to host an invitation-only event. In California, for example, only holders of type 02 winegrowers licenses may hold these events, not virtual wineries under a type 17/20 license. The next question is where the event may be held; only at the winery, at an associated taproom, at a restaurant, at a festival, etc. Some states place limitations on whether invitations to an event may be sent to the general public or only to specific addresses. Others have rules that cap the number of attendees or dictate how admittance must be controlled.

In states that allow invitation-only events off-site, winemaker’s dinners are a great option for consumers who want a more personal relationship with a winery. Typically held at a restaurant or private club, attendees get a special, “insider” type of experience and the opportunity to interact with the people who best know the wine.

In most cases, the winery may take orders for wine sales, but they may not actually sell wine at the event. Likewise, consignment sales are generally not allowed; any wine sold to attendees must be purchased from the winery by the host facility and it may not return unsold bottles. Local rules may also limit the amount of samples that are provided to attendees and whether full glasses or bottles may be sold at the event.

SUMMARY

As with part 1 of this article, because the laws vary significantly from state-to-state, and because there are so many variations on the types of special events a winery may host, it would be impossible to identify every legal issue to be considered. But, while the myriad of laws and regulations may seem daunting, once a winery understands the rules in its jurisdiction, compliance is not overly complicated or burdensome. Given that these special events play a big role in promoting a brand and can be a significant source of revenue, learning the do’s and don’ts is a small price to pay.

Overall, there are several broad questions a winery should ask while planning a special event. Is the winery allowed to host the event (are there any zoning, lease or deed, noise ordinance, or license issues that would restrict the ability to hold the event)? What limitations are there on setting up the event (such as what licenses or permits are required, who may attend, how may it be advertised, how many people will be permitted, and how will attendance be controlled)? Finally, what limitations are there on the event itself (who may be served, what may be served, can product can be sold, what activities are allowed/not allowed)? The answers to these questions are often scattered throughout various sections of state and local statutes and regulations. For advice relating to a specific proposed event, consultation with an attorney is strongly recommended.

Brian Kaider is a principal of KaiderLaw, an intellectual property law firm with extensive experience in the craft beverage industry. He has represented clients from the smallest of start-up breweries to Fortune 500 corporations in the navigation of regulatory requirements, drafting and negotiating contracts, prosecuting trademark and patent applications, and complex commercial litigation.

Email: bkaider@kaiderlaw.com
Phone: (240) 308-8032

Does Your Wine Require Formula Approval

By Brian D. Kaider, Esq.

The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) has the authority to regulate the production and importation of wine in the United States.  In some cases, the TTB requires approval of the formula before a manufacturer may make certain wines.  The rules relating to whether a formula is required, however, can be confusing.  For example, is a formula required for a wine made from both apple and raspberry?  What about a dry-hopped mead? ere is a well-known joke among lawyers:

  A law school professor said to a graduating class, “Three years ago, when asked a legal question, you could answer, in all honesty, ‘I don’t know.’  Now you can say with great authority, ‘It depends.”

Thus it is with wine formulas; the answer to both questions above is… it depends.

What is a Formula and Why Does It Need Approval?

In simple terms, a formula is a recipe for the wine.  It tells the TTB the total yield or batch size, provides a quantitative list of ingredients, describes how the product is produced, and quantifies the alcohol content of the finish product.  As the agency charged with ensuring the safety of alcoholic beverages, the TTB needs this information to ascertain any potential health threats.  While wine made solely from the juice of ripe grapes (see “Natural Wines,” below) is well understood and does not require submission of a formula, manufacturers like to push the boundaries of flavor and impact, fermenting whatever they determine to be fermentable.  Submitting formulas for such wines enables the TTB to determine whether those boundaries may have been pushed too far.

Types of Wine

While there are many types of wine defined in Title 27, Section 24.10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (27 CFR §24.10), for the purposes of this article, we will focus on four.

Natural Wine – “The product of the juice or must of sound, ripe grapes or other sound, ripe fruit (including berries) made with any cellar treatment authorized by … this part and containing not more than 21 percent by weight (21 degrees Brix dealcoholized wine) of total solids.”

Special Natural Wine – “A product produced from a base of natural wine… to which natural flavorings are added, and made pursuant to an approved formula in accordance with… this part.”

Agricultural Wine – “Wine made from suitable agricultural products other than the juice of grapes, berries, or other fruits.”

Other than Standard Wine – this catchall category encompasses wines that either don’t fit another category or fall outside a regular category by exceeding some defined limitation (e.g., a natural wine that contains more than 21 percent by weight of total solids).

Natural Wine

Most wines on the market are made from ripe grapes using standard production and cellaring practices and, therefore, fall within the category of Natural Wines, which do not require the submission of a formula for approval.  Natural Wines may be ameliorated, chaptalized, or sweetened and may only be fortified with wine spirits.  Before or during fermentation, the following ingredients may be added: sugar or concentrated fruit juice from the same kind of fruit, yeast, yeast nutrients, malo-lactic bacteria, sterilizing agents, and water (so long as the added water does not reduce Brix below 22 degrees (SG 1.092).

A list of the specific materials used in the process of filtering, clarifying, or purifying wine and the amounts that are permitted to be used in Natural Wines is listed in 27 CFR §24.246.  Use of these materials outside of the specified ranges, or use of unapproved treatment materials, may render the product an Other Than Standard Wine, requiring a formula approval, see below.

Included in Natural Wines are also products made from the fermentation of a blend of fruit juices.  For example, a wine made from fermenting apple juice and raspberry juice or grape juice and cherry juice are Natural Fruit Wines and do not require a formula.  However, a blend of two finished Natural Wines of different fruits (e.g., apple wine and raspberry wine) is considered an Other Than Standard Wine, requiring a formula.

Special Natural Wine

A Special Natural Wine begins with a base of Natural Wine, but is then flavored with natural herbs, spices, fruit juices, natural aromatics, natural essences, or other natural flavorings.  The quantities or proportions of these additions must result in character and flavor that is distinctive from the base wine and distinguishable from other natural wine.  Only 100% natural flavors may be used.  Examples of Special Natural Wine include wine made from apple juice and flavored with hops or wine made from pear juice and flavored with honey.  For coloring purposes, only caramel is permitted.

Interestingly, under 27 CFR §24.197, the natural flavoring materials may be added before or during fermentation.  For example, one might add natural cinnamon to an apple wine during fermentation.  In that case, the wine would require a formula, because it is a Natural Wine to which a natural flavor was added (i.e., a Special Natural Wine).  But, if the natural flavor is itself a fermentable, like raspberry juice, then whether a formula is required depends on when the raspberry juice is added.

Fruit juice added after fermentation is a natural flavor that is acceptable for Special Natural Wine. However, fruit juice added before or during fermentation will ferment and will be considered a fermentable instead of a flavor and the product is considered a Natural Wine, not requiring a formula.

One other wrinkle arises in the context of blending Special Natural Wines.  If two Special Natural Wines, each having their own previously approved formula are then blended together, it will require the approval of a formula for the blend; unless, the two Special Natural Wines are of the same type.  For example, producing a sweet vermouth by blending two sweet vermouths, each produced under an approved formula, the submission and approval of an additional formula is not required.  See 27 CFR §24.198.

Agricultural Wine

Agricultural Wine is made from non-fruit agricultural products, such as carrots, onions, rhubarb, or dandelions.  Honey wine (mead) and rice wine (sake) are also Agricultural Wines.  With the exception of rice, however, fermented beverages made from grains, cereals, malts, and molasses are considered malt beverages (i.e., beer) and not Agricultural Wines.

Pure dry sugar may be added to agricultural wines provided that the weight is less than the weight of the water and the agricultural product.  The Agricultural Wine may only be sweetened if the alcohol content is below 14% ABV.  No added natural or artificial flavors or colors are permitted, with the exception that hops may be added to honey wine, so long as the hops do not exceed one pound per 1,000 pounds of honey.

While, as a category, Agricultural Wines require prior formula approval, the TTB has made certain exceptions.  In view of the nearly 4,000 wine formula applications submitted in 2015, the TTB sought to streamline the approval process.  One of these efforts resulted in the issuance of TTB Ruling 2016-2, which approved general formulas for certain “standard” agricultural wines.  So long as the production guidelines set forth in 27 CFR §§24.202-204 are met, no formula is required for the following Agricultural Wines: carrot wine, dried fruit wine, honey wine (mead), maple syrup wine, onion wine, pepper wine, pumpkin wine, rhubarb wine, sweet potato wine, and tomato wine.  If one of these wines is produced outside the guidelines in the regulations, however, it will be classified as “Other Than Standard Wine,” as discussed, below.

Other Than Standard Wine/Wine Specialty

More of a catch-all category, this group of wines generally falls outside the bounds of other groups either by containing ingredients not permitted in those categories or by exceeding the permissible range for one or more allowed ingredients.  Specifically, wines in this category include: high fermentation wine, heavy bodied blending wine, Spanish type blending sherry, and wine products not for beverage use.

Further, wines made with sugar and/or water outside the limitations prescribed for standard wine; wine made by blending wines produced from different kinds of fruit; wines made with sugar other than pure dry sugar, liquid pure sugar, or invert sugar syrup; and wine made with materials not authorized for use in standard wine fall into this category.  Distilling material and vinegar stock are also considered part of the category, but unlike the others, they do not require formula approval.

Although these wines may be produced on a bonded wine premises, they must remain segregated from standard wine.  These wines must also be labeled with a statement of composition.  The statement must include the source of alcohol (including any spirits added), the flavors, the colors, and artificial sweeteners.  Certain ingredients, such as FD&C Yellow #5 and carmine/cochineal must be listed explicitly.  For example, “carbonated apple wine with cherry brandy, artificial flavors and cochineal extract.”  If different fermentables are combined before fermentation, the statement of composition will list them all followed with the word, “wine.”  E.g., “Apple-grape-pineapple wine.”  If different types of finished wines are combined, then the statement of composition lists them as separate wines.  E.g., “A blend of apple and rhubarb wines.”

Summary

In general, a wine formula is required if flavors, colors, or artificial sweeteners are added to the wine or if the base wine is not produced according to regulatory requirements.  It is important to note that once a formula is approved, if a manufacturer wants to change the recipe, through the addition or elimination of ingredients, changes in quantities used, or changes in the process of production, she must file a new formula application.  After a change in formula is approved, the original formula must be surrendered to the appropriate TTB officer. See, 27 CFR §24.81

As for our questions from above, if apple and raspberry juices are combined and then fermented, the product is a Natural Fruit Wine and does not require a formula.  If the apple juice is fermented and then the raspberry juice is added as a flavor, it is a Special Natural Wine, which does require a formula.  And if a finished apple wine is mixed with a finished raspberry wine, it is an Other Than Standard Wine and also requires a formula.  As for the dry-hopped mead, a formula is only required if the recipe exceeds one pound of hops per one thousand pounds of honey.

A Note About Cannabis

As the trend to marijuana legalization continues to grow, it seems that cannabis and alcohol are on a collision course, particularly with beer, but also with ciders, meads and other types of wine.  In states where marijuana has been legalized, homebrewers have begun to experiment with adding marijuana to their products, but can commercial breweries and wineries do the same?

No.  Certainly any winery that wanted to include some form of cannabis in its products would require a formula approval, because the additive would be either a natural flavor or an agricultural product.  The TTB issued FAQ No. A29 on May 23, 2018, stating, “TTB will not approve any formulas or labels for alcohol beverage products that contain a controlled substance under Federal law, including marijuana.”

Substances, such as tetrahydrocannabinols (THC), cannabidiols (CBD), or terpenes that are derived from any part of the cannabis plant that is not excluded from the Controlled Substances Act definition of marijuana are controlled substances, regardless of whether such substances are lawful under State law.

Certain portions of the cannabis plant, however, may be permitted.  Specifically, hemp seed oil, sterilized hemp seeds, and non-resinous mature hemp stalks may be included in alcoholic beverages, subject to formula approval, which requires submission of certain lab analyses.  The product label, however, must accurately identify the ingredient such that it is clear the ingredient is not a controlled substance.  The label also may not mislead the public into believing the product contains a controlled substance or has effects similar to those of a controlled substance.

  Brian Kaider is a principal of KaiderLaw, an intellectual property law firm with extensive experience in the craft beverage industry.  He has represented clients from the smallest of start-up breweries to Fortune 500 corporations in the navigation of regulatory requirements, drafting and negotiating contracts, prosecuting trademark and patent applications, and complex commercial litigation. 

Email: bkaider@kaiderlaw.com

Phone: (240) 308-8032

Distributor Agreements: ‘Til Death Do Us Part?

By Brian D. Kaider, Esq.

Many early stage wineries market their products via tasting room sales, wine clubs, direct-to-consumer shipments and, to the extent permitted, self-distribution to local restaurants, grocery stores, and wine stores. Eventually, winery growth will necessitate working with a distributor, a relationship not to be entered into lightly. A distributor becomes an ambassador for the winery’s brand and, once retained, the supplier may have little control over how its wine is marketed. Further, these relationships can be difficult or financially impossible to break once established.

Supplier/distributor relationships are governed by franchise laws in many states. In the absence of franchise laws, the relationship is defined entirely by a distribution agreement between the parties. But, even in franchise states, the distribution agreement can play a critical role, particularly in the termination of the distributor relationship.

Too often, however, wineries accept a distributor’s “standard” agreement and when the relationship sours, the supplier finds that they are stuck with no viable option to terminate. The best practice is to engage an experienced attorney to negotiate the terms of the distribution agreement. While even the best attorney cannot evade state franchise laws (which generally prohibit a distributor from waiving its rights), there are ways an attorney may help bring balance to the supplier/distributor relationship. Some of the key terms to negotiate include termination, territory, brand scope, and exclusivity.

Termination

The most critical section of the agreement sets forth the manner and circumstances under which a supplier may terminate the distributor. In a franchise state, the law typically says that a supplier may terminate for “good cause.” If good cause is defined in the law, it is paramount that the distribution agreement mirror the language of the law, because in many cases, a contract that contradicts the law will be held invalid, leaving the supplier in the position of effectively not having an agreement at all.

For example, the Virginia Wine Franchise Act states that good cause includes “failure by the wholesaler to substantially comply, without reasonable cause or justification, with any reasonable and material requirement imposed upon him in writing by the winery.” Further, the Act provides, “good cause shall not be construed to exist without a finding of a material deficiency for which the wholesaler is responsible.” Tracking that language, a distribution agreement in Virginia should clearly define the distributor’s obligations, such as meeting certain performance goals, as “material requirements” and explicitly define certain actions, such as mishandling of the product, as “material deficiencies.”

When the law does not define good cause, and in non-franchise states, it is essential for the distribution agreement to do so. The contract should clearly set forth the distributor’s requirements that are critical to the business relationship and for which failure to perform will be grounds for termination. Examples of common requirements include: meeting specified sales and marketing goals, maintaining appropriate records and reports regarding inventory and sales, transporting and storing the product under specified temperature and lighting conditions, exercising adequate quality control measures to ensure product freshness, and paying invoices within a specified time frame. It is also common to include termination rights if the distributor is declared bankrupt, enters a voluntary petition for bankruptcy, enters into a compromise or agreement for the benefit of its creditors, or fails to maintain in good standing all Federal and State licenses and permits necessary for the proper conduct of its business.

In some cases, sale of the distributor or even a change in the ownership structure may be justification for termination. For example, if an acquiring distributor has a much larger portfolio, especially if some brands are direct competitors, the supplier may have grounds to object to the acquisition. While not always allowing a supplier to terminate the distributor, this period during which a supplier may object can provide an opportunity to negotiate with the new distributor to sign a more favorable agreement.

In some franchise states, a supplier must compensate the distributor for the lost business even if the supplier is able to terminate for cause. Sometimes the law simply says the supplier must pay the distributor the “fair market value” of the distribution rights. There can be an expensive battle just to determine that compensation if fair market value is not defined in the distribution agreement. Often, the value is defined as a percentage of the prior year’s case volume multiplied by some dollar amount per case. The “standard” contracts pushed by some distributors can be very severe in this section. In the beer industry, it is not uncommon to see values set at an entire year’s worth of profits times a multiplier that can range from 1.5 to many times higher. In practice, often a new distributor will buy out the distribution rights from the old distributor, but if the supplier wants to return to self-distribution, this buy-out provision may be cost prohibitive.

Territory

Depending on the size, experience, and reach of the distributor, there may be an opportunity to creatively carve out different territories. Territories are most commonly limited to certain states. However, a supplier may be able to limit a smaller distributor to certain counties or even specific types of establishments (grocery stores, but not restaurants, for example). One of the clearest breaches of the distribution agreement, that may constitute good cause for termination, is for a distributor to make sales outside of its contracted territory.

The growth of direct-to-consumer (DtC) sales is one of the biggest threats to the distributor’s business model in the wine industry. According to the 2017 Direct to Consumer Wine Shipping Report (www.dtcreport.com), the 2016 volume of direct-to-consumer wine shipments increased by 17.1% to 5.02 million cases. To mitigate this risk, it is becoming increasingly common for distributors to seek limitations on such sales within their territories in the distribution agreement. Since small wineries make up the fastest-growing segment of these DtC sales, they should carefully evaluate the business case for this type of restriction.

Brands

Generally, when a distributor is hired to carry a winery’s brand, it has the right to all of the products in that brand. But exactly what constitutes a “brand” is unclear both in the statutory language of most state franchise laws and in many distribution agreements. For example, Boordy Vineyards, the first commercial winery in the State of Maryland, sells three “series” of wines, a Landmark series, a Chesapeake Icons series, and a Sweetland Cellars series. The labels on the first two series includes the Boordy Vineyards logo (the name in gold lettering in a black rectangle), but the Sweetland Cellars wines do not (see below). In fact, the only indication that the Sweetland Cellars wines are made by Boordy is a statement to that effect in small print on the back label.

The question is whether the Boordy wines are all a single brand, two brands (one that includes the Landmark and Chesapeake Icons series, since they both carry the Boordy logo and the other being the Sweetland Cellars series, which does not), or three separate brands. Since Maryland does not have a franchise law with respect to wines, the parties are essentially free to define the brands as they wish in their distribution agreement. Failing to make an explicit definition can leave open to interpretation whether the agreement covers the winery’s entire repertoire of products or only a subset. That vagueness can be costly if a dispute arises between a winery and distributor. For what it’s worth, all of Boordy’s wines are managed by a single distributor, though it does hold back a few of the Landmark series wines for sale exclusively through the winery.

Maryland does, however, have a beer franchise law and while “brand” is not explicitly defined, the law appears to favor the distributor in terms of brand scope. Specifically, section 105 of Maryland’s Beer Franchise Fair Dealing Act prohibits a brewery from entering into a beer franchise agreement with more than one distributor for “its brand or brands of beer” in a given territory. One might argue that the language “or brands” means that the first distributor has the right to all brands of the manufacturer in a given territory. In fact, that very issue was litigated in the 1985 case of Erwin and Shafer, Inc. v. Pabst Brewing Co., Inc. and Judge Couch, writing for the panel of The Court of Appeal of Maryland, disagreed. The court held that if a brewery retained a distributor to handle one or more of its brands within a territory, it could not then contract with a second distributor within the territory for those same brands. It could, however, contract with a second distributor to carry a different set of brands.

How far the court would take its interpretation of what is a “brand” is unclear, however. In the Pabst case, the first distributor was given the right to distribute Pabst brand beers, but Pabst later merged with Olympia Brewing Company and gave the second distributor the right to sell its newly acquired Hamm’s brand beers. Whether the court would have allowed the brewery to contract with one distributor for Pabst and another for Pabst Extra Light it did not say.

Exclusivity

Even if rights under a distribution agreement cannot be divided by brand (as in the case of the beer franchise law in Maryland), some states may nevertheless allow a supplier to contract with more than one distributor within a territory. If permitted in their state, a winery should ideally enter into all of its distribution agreements for a given territory simultaneously, providing notice to each distributor. At a minimum, the winery should ensure that the first agreement entered into is explicitly designated as non-exclusive. Otherwise, the distributor may view the agreement as giving it exclusive rights to the territory and could sue the winery for diminishing the distributor’s business if it were to engage a second distributor in that territory.

Final Thoughts

Whether a winery is in a franchise state or not, it is critical that it review and negotiate its distribution agreements carefully, with the assistance of an experienced attorney. It is also important to remember that the supplier’s diligence does not end when the agreement is signed. No matter how well the terms of the distribution agreement are negotiated and drafted, they are effectively useless if the supplier cannot back up its claims for good cause. Accordingly, thorough documentation is essential. If a distributor is not meeting sales goals, mishandling product, or failing to provide adequate reports, they must be given written notice of those deficiencies each time they occur.

There are great distributors out there who become essential partners in a winery’s business. But, sometimes those relationships can turn sour and signing an agreement without anticipating complications down the line can make it virtually impossible to sever those ties. A little forethought and planning and a lot of diligence will go a long way toward a successful termination of a bad relationship.

Brian Kaider is a principal of KaiderLaw, an intellectual property law firm with extensive experience in the craft beverage industry. He has represented clients from the smallest of start-up breweries to Fortune 500 corporations in the navigation of regulatory requirements, drafting and negotiating contracts, prosecuting trademark and patent applications, and complex commercial litigation.

bkaider@kaiderlaw.com
(240) 308-8032

The Most Common Types of Financing Available on the Market for your Business

By Angela Faringhy, Innovative Lease Services, Inc

Metal tanks in a row inside the winery factory

Let’s talk about money. In order for your agricultural and wine business to grow – sufficient funds are needed to take on projects, making purchases and expanding your operations to become more efficient and in turn make more money. It sounds so simple, right?

Business owners, both small and large, often go to banks for financial assistance. While banks are one avenue for support, they are not the only establishment. I am here to share with you the most common types of financing you’ll come across and whom you can get them from.
As commercial financing experts working in the industry for over 30 years, we would like to share with you the most common and beneficial financing programs out there on the market for small to medium sized businesses. From cold cash to needing to purchase equipment to restocking inventory and supplies – discover which financing product closely matches your business’s needs.

Equipment Financing and Leasing
– How to get New Equipment

When the situation arises where your business needs to purchase equipment, you don’t have to pay cash to buy it outright, you can finance it. Tractors, stainless steel tanks, destemmers, computer systems and items like table and chairs are all examples of equipment that doesn’t need to be updated frequently and therefore can easily be financed, under the product name, Equipment Financing.

The entity supplying the funding (also known as a Lender) basically purchases the equipment from the supplier and rents the equipment back to the Lessee (your business) for a low monthly fee. At the end of the lease the Lessee has the option to purchase the equipment for as little as $1 or start a new lease for the latest and greatest equipment models. Leases range from 12-72 month terms and can include seasonal payment provisions to help match the cash flows of your business.

By leasing your equipment you also preserve your cash and pay for the equipment over the life of its use. Example a new high producing destemmer costs $40,000 or three new oak casks will come in close to $55,000. It’s hard to fork over the dough when your business is tight on funds. With Equipment Financing you can invest your saved money into other facets of the business or keep safe for future endeavors.

Where to get Equipment Financing: Shop Private Lenders or local credit unions for best programs.

Working Capital Loans
– How to get Cold Cash

Loans are one of the most common forms of business financing. The Working Capital Loan is designed as a short-term solution for those businesses in need of money to help run operations on any scale.

Whether you need to meet routine expenses or pay for new business endeavors, the Business loan is essentially a cash infusion into your bank account that can be used for literally any business expense.

Most commonly working capital is used for growth, debt and inventory (just one or a mix of all 3).

Growth – Utilize capital to expand operations, create a new product line or launch a marketing campaign to drive more sales.

Debt – Use funds to pay delinquent taxes or pre-pay taxes, cover payroll needs, or pay off any other form of high interest debt the business has collected.

Inventory – Stock up on goods that contribute to your bottom line such as; brand new bottles, yeast, boxes, oak barrels, supplies, wine club swag etc.

Where to get a business loan: Lenders, banks and the SBA (application process to qualify).

Invoice Factoring
– Also Known as the Cash Advance

Having seasonal cash flow fluctuations can be a major issue when trying to grow a business. What I mean by this is if a business invoices a customer and in turn gets paid weeks after services are rendered or goods are shipped, there is a lack of consistent cash flow or immediate exchange of money for services. That business will still have to pay up front for supplies and labor, but the valuable cash flow is tied up in invoices leaving the bank account empty. One effective way to solve the cash flow crunch is with Invoice Factoring.

Invoice factoring is simple in how it works:

1. You sell your invoices to a factoring finance provider (like ILS).

2. Factoring provider advances you up to 95% of the invoice amount in 24 hours or as quick as same day.

3. Factoring provider collects full invoice amount from your customer(s).

4. Once your customer pays the factoring company (1 week- 6 months etc.) You get the remaining balance (minus a small factoring fee).

Many companies that often invoice other businesses have found invoice factoring to be an effective and consistent financial strategy for their business – keep reading to learn why.

Unexpected Expenses

Just about every business faces the surprise and stress of an unexpected cost and there isn’t enough cash on hand to manage. Invoice Factoring allows a business to quickly cover those unexpected costs.

Extension of Billing Department

It is common for back offices to struggle with keeping up on billing and collecting from customers. Or if your accounting department isn’t effective in making sure payments are received on time. Many Invoice Factoring partners act as an extension of your billing department so you can eliminate a headache of chasing down payments and focus on other things.

Essentially a cash advance, it’s your money you are just getting it faster!

Where to get Invoice Factoring: Specific Lenders whom offer Invoice Factoring Programs

You may be wondering what about investors, angel funds, cash advances, lines of credit, etc. We have not listed those as we find our customers often come to us in distress after taking on this type of obligation. There are many setbacks with giving away a portion or selling your soul to investors. Also, opening up to many business lines of credit (credit cards), can be a very dark hole to try and climb out of.

Equipment Financing, Working Capital Loans, and Invoice Factoring all have some commonalities and that is they each save your business thousands in capital, apply and receive funding as quick as same week, and most importantly save you from some serious financial mishaps that you may not be able to recover from.

Given that every business is unique, make sure to first consider all of your needs and options. We are a commercial lender and provide custom Equipment Financing Programs, Working Capital Loans and Invoice Factoring Programs. We are available for a free consultation to help you discover what financing product fits your business needs.

For more information visit
Innovative Lease Services, Inc.
online at www.ilslease.com

The Real Benefits of Financing: What are My Options?

By Angela Faringhy, Innovative Lease Services, Inc.

Financing Versus Equity Financing

Banks, Lenders, and Investors (oh my!) all exist because we fellow businesses need them. They sometimes can be the fine line between succeeding and closing the doors for good. Each of these entities, holders of large sums of money, provide capital.

In order to build new wineries, buy new equipment, develop new products, and upgrade information technology, businesses have to have money.

Banks, Lenders and Investors each have different financial structures and costs associated with using their money – also known as their “cost of doing business”. The beginning of the year is a popular time for companies to seek out financing assistance due to restructuring or restrategizing operations. No matter the goal, preparation and knowledge is the key to success.

Money Comes with a Price

Money is what we use to buy goods and services. There are many forms of monies in the world but here in the US we use the US Dollar. Not every dollar is treated equal. As a matter of fact every dollar, depending on where it comes from has its own price tag.

The cost of capital refers to your cost of making a specific investment and what you make in return. The basic formula for Cost of Capital is:

the amount of money (cost) and capital (cash) or
another infusion of equity into your business =
your businesses expenses and how much
you pay for it

Generally, business owners will not invest in new projects unless the return on the capital investment is greater than the cost of the capital. The cost of capital is key to all business decisions.

Continue to read up on the two most common ways a business can acquire money; Financing versus Equity Financing.

Equity Financing

Equity in business is the portion of the company’s assets that belong to the owners or stockholders. If a company uses funds provided by investors, then the cost of capital is known as the cost of equity.

Investors, angel funds, venture capitalists etc., all fall under the equity financing umbrella. In summary a business gives up a piece of their company’s equity to purchase cash to expand business and operations, essentially giving up a portion of ownership stake. These investors don’t actively participate in the daily management of the company, but they are active in strategic planning in order to reduce risks and maximize profits.

A popular example is the hit television series Shark Tank. Startup and established businesses alike come on the show seeking financial help, and are willing to negotiate a percentage stake of their business for a monetary investment from the “Sharks.” This is actually the most expensive form of financing. Here is an example why.

Let’s use John’s Packaging, a startup product packaging business. John needs about $100,000 for additional equipment and expenses to really get his business going. John finds an investor willing to provide the $100,000 in return for 20% stake in the company. Let’s fast forward five years, and John’s Packaging is a success valued at $5 million dollars. The 20% stake has grown to a value of 1 million dollars. That is a 1000% return on investment, great for the investor, not so great for John. In conclusion, John received all of the money he needed initially but later down the road realized the true value of what he had given up early on in the game.

Equity Financing is a top choice for a startup who is not necessarily pulling in monthly income quite yet and needs financial assistance to get operations up and running.

Financing

Referring to the cost of capital, Financing is known as cost of debt in the financing world. The word debt gets a bad rap, but it really shouldn’t always be considered a negative. Debt is when the borrower is required to repay the balance by a certain date. Good debt is an investment that will grow in value and generate long term income.

Equipment Financing and Leasing, Working Capital Loans, Cash Advances, and Invoice Factoring are the main products under the financing umbrella.

Financing is provided by lenders and banks. The cost of debt is the interest rate paid by the company on the financing amount. Interest rates are determined by a combination of elements; the current state of the market, how long a business has been operating, risk factors, credit scores, bank history and amount needed. An advantage is the fact that interest rate expenses are tax deductible and therefore more tax-efficient than equity financing. This form of financing is also able to provide services to a broader range of businesses across all industries with a variety of financial histories.

Financing differs from equity financing in that a business may acquire capital without giving away any portion of the business and essentially is utilizing a line of credit. Financing programs are structured to have fixed monthly payments over a 2 or 5 year horizon. You always know going in what your cost is going to be.

John’s Packaging, an 8 year old company needs capital to pay for replacement equipment costing $100,000. John qualifies for an Equipment Financing Program from a Private Lender, whom will provide all $100,000. In return John makes monthly payments for 24 months (also known as the terms) until the $100,000 is paid off. At the end of the term John owns the equipment and still owns 100% of his business.

Financing is a top choice for businesses who are in operation and can make the monthly payments.

In Summary

Partnering up with an investor is expensive, however investors can also provide invaluable industry expertise that may not be available from other resources.

Financing on the other hand is a shorter term investment to help boost business without restructuring or including more hands in the profit share.

The take away is for each and every business to spend time evaluating its true needs, and the potential cost of bringing an investor into the mix or taking out a line of credit.

Innovative Lease Services is a commercial lender and provider of custom Financing Programs.
Visit www.ilslease.com
or call 800-438-1470
for more information.

Adding a Financing Arm to Your B2B Business “aka” In-House Customer Payment Plans

By Angela Faringhy, Innovative Lease Services, Inc

With majority of business processes automated – payment plans are more readily available than ever before. This includes business goods, services, and consumer goods – almost everything under the sun can be financed.  With that being said it is crucial for a business to offer payment plans for products and services to keep up with competition and most importantly grow sales and increase revenue.  Commonly, a customer that wants or requires a finance option is often not going to share that with whom they are purchasing from. Keep in mind, 100% of your customers that pay cash are already doing so. So suppliers offering a financing option have the chance to convert more existing prospects into buyers.  As a private lender in the B2B space, read more to discover why one of the biggest mistakes a supplier or wholesaler of equipment can make is not providing alternative payment solutions to customers.

Customers will go to Competitors

When a business is greatly in need of business equipment and does not have the funds for it, they will always opt for an affordable option or a supplier whom offers payment plans.

A simple example: a winery’s 7 year old sprayer has given its last spray. The winery simply cannot afford not to get another sprayer immediately. Bugs, fertilizer, amongst other factors contribute to a ruined crop in a very short amount of time. And with no flexible budget to purchase a top of the line brand new machine outright – the winery will seek a supplier who provides some sort of payment plan because they cannot take the hit of such a financial burden at once, so unexpectedly. Next, the winery finds a supplier who lets them make small monthly payments for 24 months. This particular supplier whom offers payment options reaps the benefits of both worlds, selling to those businesses who cannot pay in full and those who can!

Customers Will Buy Less, When They Could Buy More

A grape grower is shopping for a new ripper in order to replant a diseased section for upcoming seasons. The grower is a repeat customer of S.C. Agriculture Equipment & Services, and wants to buy the same model ripper previously purchased. They have the money and are ready to pay in full. However S.C.’s Equipment offers financing now for all equipment and takes the opportunity to tell the grape grower about their new line of premium rippers. The premium line has new technology for better more efficient soil results. These rippers start at $5,000 more than the growers past model. However with payment plan options the grower can now afford one of the premium rippers! They decide to finance in order to upgrade to the higher end ripper. S.C. Agriculture Equipment & Services increased profits on an already secured customer.

Making all equipment affordable by different means of payment arrangements makes room for upselling and in turn more profit!

Common Concerns

Most commonly a business supplier of equipment will not have the financial resources to provide products upfront without being properly reimbursed at the time of transaction. Or typically the business does not want to take the risk of providing payment plans, which can have complications including; customers defaulting on their payments which leads to having to chase down the customer to get the equipment back, or taking further legal action. Thank goodness for collections!

Commercial Lenders and Equipment Leasing

This is where 3rd party Commercial Lenders come into play. A Commercial Lender is a financial institution which provides Financing programs that help support and increase the sales of their Vendor partners. These plans are commonly known as Vendor Financing, In-house Financing, White Label Financing, etc. Here, the lender acts as the de-facto financial arm for the Vendor and provides financing to its customers.

This becomes a real win-win-win for all three parties involved in the transaction. The Vendor gets to make the sale, the Lender gets to gain a new customer, and the end-user gets the equipment they need at the monthly payment that fits their budget.

Customers will experience significant benefits when financing with an independent lender, including speed of approval, limited or no financial information required, and the ability to structure custom payments and terms. For companies that have less-than-perfect credit, an independent lender is often the best solution as the credit windows are often significantly larger. What does this mean for the equipment supplier? Fast transactions and happy customers!

The typical Vendor Financing Program utilizes an Equipment Lease. The entity supplying the funding (also known as a Lender) basically purchases the equipment from the supplier and rents the equipment back to the Lessee (customer) for a low monthly fee. The lease can include cost of equipment, tax, shipping, installation and training. At the end of the lease the Lessee has the option to purchase the equipment for as little as $1 or start a new lease for the latest and greatest equipment models. Leases range from 12-72 month terms and can include seasonal payment provisions to help match the cash flows of the business.

For a customer that wants to own the equipment, most Independent Lenders will provide an Equipment Finance Agreement (EFA) whereby the customer is the owner of the equipment at the onset and the Lender is a Secured Party.

Wait…What About Banks?

Keep in mind, most bank loans will come with a requirement for a significant down payment, often as high as 10-20% of the equipment cost. And, bank loans usually only cover the equipment itself and do not include the installation, shipping, tax, and other “soft costs.” Timing is another factor that can greatly slow the process down. Banks can take weeks to decide on a loan approval for customers. Most importantly, a Bank does not lock in the specific Vendor into the transaction the way and Independent can, meaning your customer can take that approval to your competitor. ILS does not recommend sending customers to banks to get financing for business purchases.

Finding a Financing Partner

With many commercial lenders providing vendor programs, it is important to do the homework and research a partner whom can make the process as simple, seamless and speedy as possible. Most importantly seek out a partner that protects your sale throughout the process and does not charge you anything to be a partner – at ILS we call this “a no strings attached partnership.”

At ILS we have found that Vendors who did not previously offer a financing option can increase their prospect conversion rate by over 10%. Remember, most prospects are already sold on your equipment solution but unless they are a cash buyer they may not have the resources. By controlling the financing, you further control your sales.

About the Author:

 Innovative Lease Services, Inc. (ILS) is a private lender specializing in Vendor Financing Programs specifically in the agriculture, winery, brewing, and distilling industries. For more information or to enroll in the Vendor Program please call: 800-438-1470 or visit www.ilslease.com/equipment-lease/offer-financing.

Brokers See Themselves as ‘Bridge’ Between Growers, Wineries

By Jim Offner

Wine and grape brokers insist that their role transcend that of simple intermediary between grower and winery. Some involved in the process go so far as to eschew the term “broker” in describing what they do to bring the parties together.

“I don’t like the word broker; it sounds like a used car salesman, somebody who’s taking advantage of somebody who doesn’t know anything,” said Shannon Gunier, co-owner of Lower Lake, California-based brokering firm North Coast Winegrapes. “I like the word concierge because they help you find your way.”

Gunier, who, along with husband Rick, started her business in 2010, said the couple operates as the “eyes and ears” of their customers. “Use a broker if you’re unfamiliar with the region you’re buying from, you’re new in the business, and you don’t know where to get your fruit or bulk wine,” she said.

What to Expect From a Broker

Whatever the precise term, a broker’s job is multi-faceted, Gunier said. That includes finding the right wine grapes, bulk wines or shiners (finished wines that arrive at a winery unlabeled).

Brokers can also lead their customers through a complicated decision process, Gunier said. “First, make yourself a little familiar with what you’re trying to buy and what flavor profile you want.”

Expertise is stock and trade of the sharp broker, said Jim Smith, owner of Lakeport, California-based Case By Case Wine and Grape Brokers Inc. “Someone like myself who’s been around and has the connections and a third-party endorsement from a proven professional carries a lot of weight with buyers,” Smith said. “I can make a call and tell the winery, ‘If you have time, come up and look at this; otherwise, just go with me on this, and you’ll be glad.’”

A grower “who doesn’t know anybody” might cold-call a winery and try to sell grapes, but that tack rarely works, Smith said. “[A grower will say] ‘You want to take a chance on me?’ [The winery will} say no,” said Smith.

It’s also central to the broker’s job to be on top of all market trends, growing conditions, and supply issues, said Todd Azevedo, domestic broker for Ciatti Co., a global wine and grape brokerage firm based in San Rafael, California. “In any climate or economic terms, we have the most up to date info in today’s wine and grape world,” Azevedo said. “[We know] what’s going on import/export-wise, [and with] supply and demand. We have the most accurate information when you’re trying to sell your wine or grapes.”

Going through a broker isn’t required, of course, said Michael Colavita, owner of Stockton, California-based shipper F. Colavita & Son.  “Somebody can come to California and make a deal with a grower, and whatever product he comes up with, he ships it out.” Indeed, one winery operator who requested anonymity said he doesn’t need a broker. “I suppose there’s a place for it,” he said. “if you’re a bigger winery and you can afford it and don’t want to do a little work yourself, then fine. Or, if you’re going out of the country, you wouldn’t have the knowledge or resources to do it. But, If I’m knowledgeable about anything, why go through a third party?”

On the other hand, there are times when a grower isn’t equipped to or knowledgeable about how to ship their product, Colavita said. Brokers can work with shipping companies like Colavita & Son who have this know-how.

What to Consider When Choosing a Broker

Brokering grapes and wine is, above all, about relationships, Azevedo said. “Especially in the wine business, which is especially small around the world, it’s based on relationships and whom you believe will steer you in the right direction,” he said.

Having “eyes and ears” in “all major winegrowing regions” is a big advantage for the Ciatti Company’s clients. “We have 52 dedicated employees, a network of brokers. It’s up to us to discuss what’s happening in all these realms,” he said. “We’re involved in every region on a day-to-day basis.”

A broker who knows a lot about wine and everything that goes into the growing, buying and selling of grapes, has to be gifted in creating trusting relationships, Smith said. “It’s about personal relationships and trust. And trust is key.”

Integrity and a willingness to build lasting relationships between buyer and seller is a must for a successful broker, Smith insists. “I am very confident in stating we’re probably the most honest, we don’t try to hide anything,” he said. “We like everybody to show up at the vineyard and meet and greet. If you’re as trusted as we are, you can’t put a number to that value. If you’re a grower and have spent $120,000 on your operation, you need that trust.”

Gunier agrees that choosing a broker requires the right fit: “It should be somebody you have a rapport with. This is their biggest expenditure.”

A little research always is helpful, she said. “What they want to do is due diligence. Call them and ask questions,” she said. Test a broker’s efficiency, Gunier urges. “Order a sample of something and see how long it takes to get it,” she said. “If it takes long or they don’t respond, you’ll know. You’re sending money to somebody you don’t know, after all.”

A buyer or seller might be tempted to go with the most prominent brokers, but that’s not necessarily the best route, Smith said. “Of course, I would imagine most people, their first thought is let’s go with the biggest outfit, but if you’re not one of the biggest growers and you don’t have 500 tons to sell, they’ll give you a number,” he said. “Do you have 500 tons to sell? That’s great. They know they’re going to make a good chunk of money. I’ve always been a big proponent of the small to mid-size grower. I prefer to get a little more personal with the small or mid-sized grower and tend to shy away from the 500- to 1,000-ton growers.”

Reputation, not size, is what to look for in a broker, Smith said. “If you ask around, wherever you are, and a broker is not doing the right thing, somebody will know about it sooner or later,” he said. “It’s a small world and tiny industry. We all run in the same circles.”

Colavita said, as a shipper, he offers other advantages to customers. For example, he points to storage facilities that his company owns. “The advantage, since I own my own facilities, my staff can tell me these grapes won’t hold up, so don’t ship them out,” he said. “Let’s call it a hands-on type of operation. Of course, you’re dealing with Mother Nature; you never know what she’s going to do.”

A good broker can help minimize mistakes, Colavita said. “To deal with somebody who’s had a reputation of doing it right is an advantage, so they have confidence they’re going to get a suitable product for their needs.”

Customers anywhere can access Colavita’s services. “My customers are all over the country. I have some smaller California wineries who rely on me for a certain grape,” he said. “But, I have customers from here to Maine and Florida – all over.”

Brokers deal in the bulk-wine, processing and storage markets in addition to the growing sector, and that macro-view is essential, Azevedo said. “I’m trying to lessen the lumps of the economy, so you can go to your bank, investors and family and make wise financial decisions,” he said.

Know What You Want

Choosing the right broker depends on several factors, including whether a winery might be looking to buy “local” grapes, or find a product that isn’t available nearby. “People want to buy local, but they also want to buy Chardonnay, Merlot and Zinfandel because that’s what the market is drinking,” she said. “If the winery is familiar with the market and knows what’s local, they can do those deals direct. There probably aren’t many brokers able to provide that service outside of California.”

Case By Case supplies wineries inside and outside California, Smith said. “I think we’re in 27 states across the country now. If somebody wants a longer-term agreement for out of state that doesn’t have the highs and lows, it will be a little less money per ton, but a long-sure road.”

Brokers can help growers to develop a workable price for their product, Smith said. “There’s another type of grower that tries to take every penny,” he said. “They ask us to get this outrageous price. I try to talk them off the edge. Sometimes, they come in at the 11th hour and say we’ve just got to sell the fruit. They slash their price at the last minute. I’ve told them, don’t go for the throat; go for the profitable long-term contract.”

Contracts: To Do or Not To Do

Rules regarding broker contracts vary widely, Azevedo said. “Everybody is different,” he said. “There are some erroneous contacts where nobody wants the liability. The bigger, the more onerous the contacts get.”

It’s important to examine the so-called “boilerplate” in a contract because one never knows what it might contain, Azevedo said. “As a broker, you need to read through the fine print. Looking for hidden fees or penalties is a big deal. It’s so drastic across the board. I could send you four contacts and all the same price, but you go through the boilerplate it’s all drastically different.”

What a contract stipulates might hinge on various factors, Gunier said. “It depends on what you’re talking about,” she said. “If you’re talking about wine grapes, the broker will provide a contract; you make sure you have a contract in place. Ask the broker, ‘Send me a finished bottle of a product from a winery in your area, and I can see what that tastes like.’ I think it points to the fact that you have to have good grapes to have good wine. “

Gunier said she’ll next-day air-freight grapes to a client, but that’s just part of the picture.

“We take pictures all the way through,” she said. “We have people come out and talk to the growers. That’s kind of our niche.” It’s a kind of match-making business, Gunier said. “We try to match the winery and grower, and all that comes in the contract – when we’re going to pick, when we’ll ship,” she said. “How much damage should there be when you get the fruit? What if half is damaged? You have to have all that lined out in a contract.”

Smith said he likes to see “a couple of simple things” in contracts.

“Number one, our contracts are two pages,” he said. “I’ve seen corporate wineries with 14-page contacts. If they have 14-page contracts, they’ve had a team of lawyers that draw that up in their favor. I don’t mess around with those type of agreements. I tell the growers, ‘You make the decision.’” An example of an unfair agreement is one that might stipulate a “brix range,” with a per-ton penalty for anything outside the limits but no clause that reimburses the grower for a loss of fruit weight due to dehydration at the winery. “I won’t be party to that kind of agreement,” Smith said. “By sticking to my guns, 27 years later, I still don’t have to clock in and work for somebody else.” Any deal carries risk, and a broker should be willing to share in it, Smith said. “When those grapes show up like I said they would, I will expect your business every year,” he said.

Colavita said he hardly ever has contracts. “It’s all done through emails and confirmation of orders, that sort of thing,” he said. “The buying end of it, some of it is on a contract basis, some is yearly – it’s all over the board. Most of this business is just word of mouth.”

Negotiations Can Vary

Deal negotiations can vary, Azevedo said. “Any given year it can be different. We deal in a real-time market. This year, it’s strictly a buyer’s market. Demand is fairly low. Supply is steady, but because demand is so low, it feels like there’s a lot of grapes and wine on the market. So, growers at this point are looking for a deal, an offer from somebody to say yes or no to, because of the timing of the situation.”

Timing is crucial, where negotiations go because markets shift capriciously. “It depends on what time of season and where you are, other buyers in the vineyard, the economy, what’s happening on the international market and the bulk-wine market, what’s happening with cannabis, beer, coffee, whatever the preference is in that world,” Azevedo said. “In agriculture, especially, you’re up against time, because grapes are a perishable product.”

Some brokers will work for a basic commission; others don’t, Gunier said. “We don’t work that way; we purchase fruit from growers and sell it,” she said. “We take some of the risk away from growers.”

Larger brokers are more likely to work on a percentage basis, Gunier said. “Those are big guys who can work on two percent selling 80 tons; our minimum order is six tons, which is a third of a truck.”

In negotiations, there are times when a grower needs to have a feel for the right deal, and the wrong one, Smith said. “In a hot market, say Cabernet Sauvignon, I’d say the power leans to the grower,” he said. “His price keeps going up. I’m on the back side of that, and I warn him not to push too hard, or he might lose a long-term buyer. When the market is in the tank, there were grapes on the vine because the tanks were full, growers were offering $350 a ton for their grapes. I was able to go around with a handful of growers we were working with and [find out what] they needed to break even and make a very marginal profit.”

Smith said his company’s customer retention is right at 99 percent, so it’s doing something right. “Working closely with our buyers, understanding what they need and trying to accomplish it – that’s our specialty,” he said.

When are Multiple Brokers Needed?

There may be times to call on more than one broker, but the odds are, a grower ultimately will come to rely on one, Azevedo said. “Personal opinion here: Because it’s a relationship-driven business and you’re building confidence in a person to be a partner in what you’re trying to achieve, it’s probably best to deal with only one,” he said. “As a winery, you’d be doing yourself a disservice if you don’t find out what the market is and what you can achieve. As a producer, I want to make sure I cover all my bases, in order to have all the information. Lo and behold, you’re probably going to go back to the same person who has given you all the information over and over again.”

Whether to work with more than one broker depends on the circumstances, Gunier said. “I think you should work with people who are willing to work with you,” she said. “You have to navigate your way through that.”

Going “local” with a broker might be the right solution in some circumstances, Gunier said. “The guy I’d be concerned about is the guy who can get you anything from anywhere,” she said, laughing.

A large-scale vineyard might bring in multiple brokers, Smith said. “If it’s a 1,000-acre vineyard, you might consider working with at least a couple brokers,” he said. “You might find you like one more than the other.”

Tariffs, Tariffs, and More Tariffs

By Dan Minutillo, Esq.

Toward the end of this week, take a minute to add up and total the amount of US tariffs imposed on Chinese goods imported into the US. You can glean this data from online aggregated digital news, television news, or from US Government pronouncements about Trump tariffs.

I would be very surprised if the number does not exceed hundreds of billions of US dollars encompassing about half of all Chinese manufactured goods entering the US. The public comment period for most US-China tariffs to be imposed to date ended this past Friday so that such tariffs can be imposed by the US Government and will either be at 25% or 10% depending on the Chinese manufactured product.

China and the US, up to this point, have enjoyed a robust trading partner experience. China is the most active trading partner with the US at about $500 billion of Chinese goods sold to the US last year. These US-China tariffs to be imposed on our most active trading partner are meant to hurt the Chinese economy for alleged unfair trade practices, misappropriating US intellectual property, and generally misbehaving in the world of international trade to the detriment of the US. China has threatened to match and retaliate against the US with equal trade sanctions on US products.

Options

US companies have four (4) primary options to avoid these Trump lead tariffs on imported Chinese goods:

  1. Find a supplier and manufacturer other than China for the goods;
  2. Pay the tariff as the importer of record;
  3. File for a US Customs classification arguing that these tariffs do not apply to its goods imported from China; or
  4. Apply for exclusion from these tariffs.

Context

For context, the exporter of record is the company or individual who is listed on export documentation as the person or entity moving product from country “A” to country “B”. The country of export is the place which the product moved from.

A product could be subject to a US-China tariff even though the product was not exported from China. Products manufactured in China (made in China) are subject to the Trump tariffs even if those products took a circuitous route to reach the shores of the US.

The importer of record is responsible for paying these Trump tariffs on Chinese goods. The importer of record is usually the buyer or distributor of the imported goods, so, 1 through 4 noted above are options for the importer of Chinese goods, that is for the US company importing Chinese goods into the US.

If the US importer decides on option 2, that is to pay the tariff as the importer of record; then it has two primary options:

  1. To absorb the cost of the tariff thereby cutting into profits; or
  2. To increase the price of the product subject to the tariff and pass this increase, either in full or in part, onto its customers thereby risking market share.

USHTS Codes

How do you determine if a product is subject to Trump’s US-China tariff?

This is where it gets a bit tricky. The “Lists” of products subject to US tariffs on China’s products are categorized by the United States Harmonized Tariff Schedule (USHTS) code system. This system categorizes products by product type and then provides multiple subcategories with further particular specified descriptions. The object is first to find the general product category on the USHTS code schedule and then continue to drill down to subcategories on this schedule until a full description of the subject product is found.

A clear, simple and definite example of a USHTS code is for laptop computers which fit into USHTS 8471.30.01.00 as automatic data processing machines that are portable, with certain weight restrictions. This USHTS code categorization is easy.

However many of the USHTS categories are confusing, to understate. For example, run a web search for “Clocks and Watches US HTS Code” and then compare the HTS data and codes that appear relating to a watch which you own then try to determine the exact US HTS code for that watch. This exercise will give you an idea about how difficult it could be to determine USHTS code and then to determine if a product is covered on one of the US-China tariff lists with high US tariff ramifications based on the USHTS code.

Requesting a Customs Classification

If a company is not sure where their product fits in the USHTS Code classification system, it can submit a description of the subject product with backup data requesting that US Customs provide an HTS classification for that product. US Customs will evaluate the information provided and assign a USHTS Code for that product. The company then merely looks at the USHTS Code table and the applicable US-China tariff lists to determine the applicable tariff amount, if any, for that product.

Requesting an Exclusion

If it appears that the product is subject to the Trump US-China tariff, the US Government has established certain procedures in the event a company believes that its product should be excluded from the US-China tariff. In order to qualify for such exclusion, in addition to following the procedures outlined in the Government’s pronouncements about exclusions, the company must prove that:

  1. The product is only available in China; or
  2. The duties imposed would cause “severe economic harm;” to the company; or
  3. The product is not strategically important to China or related to Chinese industrial programs including, in particular, the Chinese program “Made in China 2025.”

As noted, the US Government has instituted an avenue for clarification of the HTS code for a product and an avenue to request exclusion if a product appears on one of the US-China import tariff lists. Neither avenue might satisfy the company struggling to pay or “pass on” a high US-China tariff to its customers, but at least these avenues provide an opportunity for relief.

—————————————————————————————————————

Dan has practiced law in Silicon Valley since 1977. The Firm’s practice is limited to regulatory law, government contract law, and international trade law matters. Dan has received the prestigious “Silicon Valley Service Provider of the Year” award as voted by influential attorneys in Silicon Valley.He has represented many very large global companies and he has worked on the massive US Government SETI (Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence) project as well as FOEKE (worldwide nuclear plant design certification), the Olympic Games, the first Obama town hall worldwide webinar, among other leading worldwide projects.

Dan has lectured to the World Trade Association, has taught law for UCLA, Santa Clara University Law School and their MBA program, lectured to the NPMA at Stanford University, and for the University of Texas School of Law.

Dan has lectured to various National and regional attorney associations about Government contract and international trade law matters. He has provided input to the US Government regarding the structure of regulations relating to encryption (cybersecurity). He has been interviewed about international law by the Washington Post, Reuters and other newspapers.

He is the author of four books unrelated to law, one of which was a best seller for the publisher, and of dozens of legal articles published in periodicals, technical and university journals distributed throughout the world. He serves as an expert witness in United States Federal Court regarding his area of expertise.

MINUTILLO’s e-newsletter and all of its content is provided for information and very general purposes only. It is not intended to provide or offer any specific or general legal advice, or to create an attorney-client relationship. Before acting or relying on any information provided in this e-newsletter, consult an attorney who is an expert in the appropriate field of law.

Copyright © 2018 Minutillo, APLC, All rights reserved.

841 Blossom Hill Road, Second Floor
P.O. Box 20698
San Jose, CA 95160
Tel.: (408) 226-4049
Email: dan@minutillolaw.com
Website: www.minutillolaw.com

Protecting Your Business From Employee Poachers

By Brian D. Kaider, Esq.

You’ve been in business for several years and have a dozen hard-working, dedicated employees working for your company, or so you think.  Out of the blue, a new competitor enters the market and the next thing you know, all 12 of your employees have jumped ship to join the new firm.  With them, they have taken company records and customer lists.  What do you do?  Do you have any legal recourse against the poaching company? Against your former employees?  How could you have prevented this?

Can a Competitor “Poach” Your Employees?

In most states, yes.  Many people are surprised to learn that, generally, poaching is a perfectly valid and legal way to find new employees. There are exceptions and limitations, of course, but the overall policy favoring poachers is that courts do not want to unduly restrict a person’s ability to seek employment in a competitive marketplace.

An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure

The best defense against poachers is to create an environment in which your employees are happy and will be reluctant to leave.  That does not necessarily mean having the highest salaries in your business, though compensation is certainly one factor.  More important, though, is creating a culture of inclusion, where employees feel that they are valued members of a team, where they are challenged and know they will be rewarded for excellent performance.

Contractual Protections

There are many types of agreements that can help prevent poaching, but they generally fall into two broad categories; non-compete agreements and non-disclosure agreements.  These may be stand-alone contracts, or may be integrated as clauses in an employment agreement.

  • Non-Compete Agreements: Can be a valuable asset in protecting your workforce, because if certain conditions are met, a poaching company may be liable for “tortious interference of contract” between you and your employee. But, the first element of that legal claim is the existence of a valid contract. There’s the rub.  Many states, California in particular, disfavor non-compete agreements as an undue restriction on someone’s freedom to seek employment.  So, these contracts must be drafted carefully and narrowly tailored to your company’s specific circumstances so as not to create an unfair burden on the employee.

For instance, if you are in an industry where you have dozens of competitors within 20 miles of your business, then a restriction in your employment agreement prohibiting a departing employee from working for a competitor within 5 miles of your business might be considered reasonable.  But, if you have only one competitor in your state, and that competitor is 10 miles away, then a restriction in your employment agreement prohibiting a departing employee from working for a competitor within 20 miles would almost certainly be deemed unreasonable by the court.

  • Non-Solicitation Agreements: One form of non-compete agreement, however, is much more readily enforced; a non-solicitation agreement. This contract prohibits a departed employee from attempting to convince other employees to leave. While this can be very helpful in preventing a mass exodus, here too, the restrictions must be reasonable.  A prohibition from contacting other employees for six months following termination would more likely be enforced than such a prohibition for five years.  Note, however, that this agreement applies only to the departing employee; it does nothing to prevent the competitor from contacting more of your employees directly.

Even in the absence of a written non-solicitation agreement, in most jurisdictions, a current employee has a duty of loyalty to his/her employer.  This duty prohibits an employee who plans to leave from soliciting co-workers to leave at the same time.  The employee may, however, announce his departure and if co-workers approach him to inquire about the new employer, that is not a violation of the employee’s duty.

  • Non-Disclosure Agreements: While it may be difficult to prevent an employee from going to a competitor, often it isn’t the departure of the employee itself that is of concern to the employer, it’s the risk that the departing employee will provide confidential or trade secret information to the competitor. Fortunately, non-disclosure agreements are very common and widely enforceable.

There are many types of confidential and trade secret information, such as client lists, marketing and distribution plans, growth strategies, pricing structures, recipes, business methods, etc.  These are all valuable assets that should be protected by non-disclosure agreements with your employees.  The key to successful enforcement of these agreements, however, is that you yourself must treat the information as confidential and secret.  This means limiting distribution of the information within your organization to only those who need it to perform their jobs and not disclosing the information to anyone outside the organization (except lawyers, accountants, and other service professionals you have hired to support your business).  Further, you should ensure that hard copies of confidential information is kept under lock and key and electronic records are password protected with as few employees having access as is practical.

What Can You Do?

One or more of your employees has left for a competitor; what do you do?  First, take a breath.  You can’t keep all of your employees forever, people will come and go.  So take stock: how much does this departure hurt your business?  Did the employee have access to confidential or trade secret information?  Was the employee close friends with any of their coworkers in your employ?

If the employee has given you notice, but not left yet, meet with them.  Let them know they will be missed, but remind them of their duty of loyalty while they remain with you.  Identify the confidential information they have been privy to and discuss what may and may not be communicated to their new employer. If the employee received hard copies or electronic files that you consider confidential or secret, ask the employee to sign a sworn statement that they will return or destroy all copies.  If the employee is unwilling to sign such a statement or gives you indicia of hostility toward you or your company, consider terminating them on the spot.  Depending on the circumstances, you may have to pay their salary if you have a contractual notice period for termination, but at least they will have no further access to your confidential information or direct communication with your other employees.

If the employee has already left and you believe that they have taken confidential or trade secret documents and/or provided such information to their new employers, you must act quickly in order to protect your rights.  Below are some examples of legal actions to take.

Breach of Contract

If you and your employee had a written contract (non-compete or non-disclosure) you can take legal action against the employee for breach of contract.  You will need to demonstrate three elements: the existence of a valid contract, that the terms of the contract were violated by the former employee, and that the breach caused or will cause economic harm.  As discussed above, particularly for non-compete agreements, the contract must be reasonably drafted for the court to consider it valid.

Tortious Interference with Contract

If there is a valid contract with the employee, you may also be able to take action against the competitor for tortious interference with the contract.  This cause of action has five elements that must be satisfied:  1) the contract must be valid, 2) the competitor must have knowledge of the contract, 3) the competitor must intend for the new employee to breach the contract, 4) the terms of the contract must actually be breached, and 5) you must be damaged by the breach.

The second element, requiring actual knowledge of the contract by the competitor may seem a little tricky.  As a first step before filing a legal action, you can send the competitor a cease and desist letter describing the nature of the contract (non-compete, non-disclosure, etc.) and how you believe that contract will be violated by the competitor’s continued behavior.  If the competitor continues, then you can proceed with the legal action and your letter will provide proof of actual knowledge of the contract.

The most difficult element of the claim is that of damages.  In cases where you can directly tie the breach to a loss in sales, economic damages may be easy to define.  That is seldom the case, however, so seeking equitable remedies such as preventing the employee from working for the competitor may be a better approach.

Breach of Duty of Loyalty

In the absence of a non-compete/non-solicitation agreement your employees still owe you a duty of loyalty.  While the language may vary state to state, essentially the employee owes a duty to act with good faith in the furtherance of the employer’s interests  If a departing employee actively solicits others to join the new company, copies files to bring to the new company, deletes or sabotages data to inhibit your business operations, or otherwise acts in a manner that is hostile to your company, they violate this duty.  Damages may include lost profits and also punitive damages if you can demonstrate that the breach of duty was willful.

Misappropriation of Trade Secrets

Though the language of what constitutes a trade secret varies state-to-state, it is generally information that 1) is not known to the public, 2) derives independent economic value, and 3) is subject to secrecy, meaning that you have to actively maintain its secrecy.  The classic example of a trade secret is a recipe, such as the formula for Coca-Cola® or the Kentucky Fried Chicken® secret blend of 11 herbs and spices.  But, the general skills, knowledge and expertise an employee acquires through experience in the field, even while working for you, are the employee’s assets, not yours.  So, pricing information committed to their memory through servicing your clients is not protectable.  But, if they access and download a password protected pricing strategy on the company’s server and bring that information to a competitor, that would be a misappropriation.

Unfair Competition

Although poaching employees is generally a legitimate and legal business practice, there are limitations. For example, except in very specific and highly skilled fields, it is uncommon for one company to employ all of the competent people in the field.  So, while it is not per se illegal to recruit more than one employee from a competitor, engaging in a pattern of solicitation of a single company’s employees may be evidence of intent to destroy the competitor’s business or a crucial department thereof and may be actionable unfair competition.  To prevail on an unfair competition claim, you must demonstrate that the loss of key personnel will harm the company and that the competitor intended to drive you out of business. For example, if the competitor offers salaries to your entire sales team that are well-above market rate, that may be evidence of a bad faith attempt to cripple your business.

Summary

The law generally favors a person’s freedom to seek employment and is skeptical of efforts to restrict that freedom.  Nevertheless, an employer has the right to loyalty from current employees and is protected from efforts to unfairly undermine its business by stealing secret information or luring away its entire workforce.  Whether concerned with protecting trade secret information from departing employees or exposure to legal liability when recruiting a competitor’s workers, early consultation with an attorney is always a wise approach.

Brian Kaider is a principal of KaiderLaw, an intellectual property law firm with extensive experience in the craft beverage industry.  He has represented clients from the smallest of start-up breweries to Fortune 500 corporations in the navigation of regulatory requirements, drafting and negotiating contracts, prosecuting trademark and patent applications, and complex commercial litigation.

bkaider@kaiderlaw.com

 (240) 308-8032