Distributor Agreements: ‘Til Death Do Us Part?

By Brian D. Kaider, Esq.

Many early stage wineries market their products via tasting room sales, wine clubs, direct-to-consumer shipments and, to the extent permitted, self-distribution to local restaurants, grocery stores, and wine stores. Eventually, winery growth will necessitate working with a distributor, a relationship not to be entered into lightly. A distributor becomes an ambassador for the winery’s brand and, once retained, the supplier may have little control over how its wine is marketed. Further, these relationships can be difficult or financially impossible to break once established.

Supplier/distributor relationships are governed by franchise laws in many states. In the absence of franchise laws, the relationship is defined entirely by a distribution agreement between the parties. But, even in franchise states, the distribution agreement can play a critical role, particularly in the termination of the distributor relationship.

Too often, however, wineries accept a distributor’s “standard” agreement and when the relationship sours, the supplier finds that they are stuck with no viable option to terminate. The best practice is to engage an experienced attorney to negotiate the terms of the distribution agreement. While even the best attorney cannot evade state franchise laws (which generally prohibit a distributor from waiving its rights), there are ways an attorney may help bring balance to the supplier/distributor relationship. Some of the key terms to negotiate include termination, territory, brand scope, and exclusivity.

Termination

The most critical section of the agreement sets forth the manner and circumstances under which a supplier may terminate the distributor. In a franchise state, the law typically says that a supplier may terminate for “good cause.” If good cause is defined in the law, it is paramount that the distribution agreement mirror the language of the law, because in many cases, a contract that contradicts the law will be held invalid, leaving the supplier in the position of effectively not having an agreement at all.

For example, the Virginia Wine Franchise Act states that good cause includes “failure by the wholesaler to substantially comply, without reasonable cause or justification, with any reasonable and material requirement imposed upon him in writing by the winery.” Further, the Act provides, “good cause shall not be construed to exist without a finding of a material deficiency for which the wholesaler is responsible.” Tracking that language, a distribution agreement in Virginia should clearly define the distributor’s obligations, such as meeting certain performance goals, as “material requirements” and explicitly define certain actions, such as mishandling of the product, as “material deficiencies.”

When the law does not define good cause, and in non-franchise states, it is essential for the distribution agreement to do so. The contract should clearly set forth the distributor’s requirements that are critical to the business relationship and for which failure to perform will be grounds for termination. Examples of common requirements include: meeting specified sales and marketing goals, maintaining appropriate records and reports regarding inventory and sales, transporting and storing the product under specified temperature and lighting conditions, exercising adequate quality control measures to ensure product freshness, and paying invoices within a specified time frame. It is also common to include termination rights if the distributor is declared bankrupt, enters a voluntary petition for bankruptcy, enters into a compromise or agreement for the benefit of its creditors, or fails to maintain in good standing all Federal and State licenses and permits necessary for the proper conduct of its business.

In some cases, sale of the distributor or even a change in the ownership structure may be justification for termination. For example, if an acquiring distributor has a much larger portfolio, especially if some brands are direct competitors, the supplier may have grounds to object to the acquisition. While not always allowing a supplier to terminate the distributor, this period during which a supplier may object can provide an opportunity to negotiate with the new distributor to sign a more favorable agreement.

In some franchise states, a supplier must compensate the distributor for the lost business even if the supplier is able to terminate for cause. Sometimes the law simply says the supplier must pay the distributor the “fair market value” of the distribution rights. There can be an expensive battle just to determine that compensation if fair market value is not defined in the distribution agreement. Often, the value is defined as a percentage of the prior year’s case volume multiplied by some dollar amount per case. The “standard” contracts pushed by some distributors can be very severe in this section. In the beer industry, it is not uncommon to see values set at an entire year’s worth of profits times a multiplier that can range from 1.5 to many times higher. In practice, often a new distributor will buy out the distribution rights from the old distributor, but if the supplier wants to return to self-distribution, this buy-out provision may be cost prohibitive.

Territory

Depending on the size, experience, and reach of the distributor, there may be an opportunity to creatively carve out different territories. Territories are most commonly limited to certain states. However, a supplier may be able to limit a smaller distributor to certain counties or even specific types of establishments (grocery stores, but not restaurants, for example). One of the clearest breaches of the distribution agreement, that may constitute good cause for termination, is for a distributor to make sales outside of its contracted territory.

The growth of direct-to-consumer (DtC) sales is one of the biggest threats to the distributor’s business model in the wine industry. According to the 2017 Direct to Consumer Wine Shipping Report (www.dtcreport.com), the 2016 volume of direct-to-consumer wine shipments increased by 17.1% to 5.02 million cases. To mitigate this risk, it is becoming increasingly common for distributors to seek limitations on such sales within their territories in the distribution agreement. Since small wineries make up the fastest-growing segment of these DtC sales, they should carefully evaluate the business case for this type of restriction.

Brands

Generally, when a distributor is hired to carry a winery’s brand, it has the right to all of the products in that brand. But exactly what constitutes a “brand” is unclear both in the statutory language of most state franchise laws and in many distribution agreements. For example, Boordy Vineyards, the first commercial winery in the State of Maryland, sells three “series” of wines, a Landmark series, a Chesapeake Icons series, and a Sweetland Cellars series. The labels on the first two series includes the Boordy Vineyards logo (the name in gold lettering in a black rectangle), but the Sweetland Cellars wines do not (see below). In fact, the only indication that the Sweetland Cellars wines are made by Boordy is a statement to that effect in small print on the back label.

The question is whether the Boordy wines are all a single brand, two brands (one that includes the Landmark and Chesapeake Icons series, since they both carry the Boordy logo and the other being the Sweetland Cellars series, which does not), or three separate brands. Since Maryland does not have a franchise law with respect to wines, the parties are essentially free to define the brands as they wish in their distribution agreement. Failing to make an explicit definition can leave open to interpretation whether the agreement covers the winery’s entire repertoire of products or only a subset. That vagueness can be costly if a dispute arises between a winery and distributor. For what it’s worth, all of Boordy’s wines are managed by a single distributor, though it does hold back a few of the Landmark series wines for sale exclusively through the winery.

Maryland does, however, have a beer franchise law and while “brand” is not explicitly defined, the law appears to favor the distributor in terms of brand scope. Specifically, section 105 of Maryland’s Beer Franchise Fair Dealing Act prohibits a brewery from entering into a beer franchise agreement with more than one distributor for “its brand or brands of beer” in a given territory. One might argue that the language “or brands” means that the first distributor has the right to all brands of the manufacturer in a given territory. In fact, that very issue was litigated in the 1985 case of Erwin and Shafer, Inc. v. Pabst Brewing Co., Inc. and Judge Couch, writing for the panel of The Court of Appeal of Maryland, disagreed. The court held that if a brewery retained a distributor to handle one or more of its brands within a territory, it could not then contract with a second distributor within the territory for those same brands. It could, however, contract with a second distributor to carry a different set of brands.

How far the court would take its interpretation of what is a “brand” is unclear, however. In the Pabst case, the first distributor was given the right to distribute Pabst brand beers, but Pabst later merged with Olympia Brewing Company and gave the second distributor the right to sell its newly acquired Hamm’s brand beers. Whether the court would have allowed the brewery to contract with one distributor for Pabst and another for Pabst Extra Light it did not say.

Exclusivity

Even if rights under a distribution agreement cannot be divided by brand (as in the case of the beer franchise law in Maryland), some states may nevertheless allow a supplier to contract with more than one distributor within a territory. If permitted in their state, a winery should ideally enter into all of its distribution agreements for a given territory simultaneously, providing notice to each distributor. At a minimum, the winery should ensure that the first agreement entered into is explicitly designated as non-exclusive. Otherwise, the distributor may view the agreement as giving it exclusive rights to the territory and could sue the winery for diminishing the distributor’s business if it were to engage a second distributor in that territory.

Final Thoughts

Whether a winery is in a franchise state or not, it is critical that it review and negotiate its distribution agreements carefully, with the assistance of an experienced attorney. It is also important to remember that the supplier’s diligence does not end when the agreement is signed. No matter how well the terms of the distribution agreement are negotiated and drafted, they are effectively useless if the supplier cannot back up its claims for good cause. Accordingly, thorough documentation is essential. If a distributor is not meeting sales goals, mishandling product, or failing to provide adequate reports, they must be given written notice of those deficiencies each time they occur.

There are great distributors out there who become essential partners in a winery’s business. But, sometimes those relationships can turn sour and signing an agreement without anticipating complications down the line can make it virtually impossible to sever those ties. A little forethought and planning and a lot of diligence will go a long way toward a successful termination of a bad relationship.

Brian Kaider is a principal of KaiderLaw, an intellectual property law firm with extensive experience in the craft beverage industry. He has represented clients from the smallest of start-up breweries to Fortune 500 corporations in the navigation of regulatory requirements, drafting and negotiating contracts, prosecuting trademark and patent applications, and complex commercial litigation.

bkaider@kaiderlaw.com
(240) 308-8032

The Most Common Types of Financing Available on the Market for your Business

By Angela Faringhy, Innovative Lease Services, Inc

Metal tanks in a row inside the winery factory

Let’s talk about money. In order for your agricultural and wine business to grow – sufficient funds are needed to take on projects, making purchases and expanding your operations to become more efficient and in turn make more money. It sounds so simple, right?

Business owners, both small and large, often go to banks for financial assistance. While banks are one avenue for support, they are not the only establishment. I am here to share with you the most common types of financing you’ll come across and whom you can get them from.
As commercial financing experts working in the industry for over 30 years, we would like to share with you the most common and beneficial financing programs out there on the market for small to medium sized businesses. From cold cash to needing to purchase equipment to restocking inventory and supplies – discover which financing product closely matches your business’s needs.

Equipment Financing and Leasing
– How to get New Equipment

When the situation arises where your business needs to purchase equipment, you don’t have to pay cash to buy it outright, you can finance it. Tractors, stainless steel tanks, destemmers, computer systems and items like table and chairs are all examples of equipment that doesn’t need to be updated frequently and therefore can easily be financed, under the product name, Equipment Financing.

The entity supplying the funding (also known as a Lender) basically purchases the equipment from the supplier and rents the equipment back to the Lessee (your business) for a low monthly fee. At the end of the lease the Lessee has the option to purchase the equipment for as little as $1 or start a new lease for the latest and greatest equipment models. Leases range from 12-72 month terms and can include seasonal payment provisions to help match the cash flows of your business.

By leasing your equipment you also preserve your cash and pay for the equipment over the life of its use. Example a new high producing destemmer costs $40,000 or three new oak casks will come in close to $55,000. It’s hard to fork over the dough when your business is tight on funds. With Equipment Financing you can invest your saved money into other facets of the business or keep safe for future endeavors.

Where to get Equipment Financing: Shop Private Lenders or local credit unions for best programs.

Working Capital Loans
– How to get Cold Cash

Loans are one of the most common forms of business financing. The Working Capital Loan is designed as a short-term solution for those businesses in need of money to help run operations on any scale.

Whether you need to meet routine expenses or pay for new business endeavors, the Business loan is essentially a cash infusion into your bank account that can be used for literally any business expense.

Most commonly working capital is used for growth, debt and inventory (just one or a mix of all 3).

Growth – Utilize capital to expand operations, create a new product line or launch a marketing campaign to drive more sales.

Debt – Use funds to pay delinquent taxes or pre-pay taxes, cover payroll needs, or pay off any other form of high interest debt the business has collected.

Inventory – Stock up on goods that contribute to your bottom line such as; brand new bottles, yeast, boxes, oak barrels, supplies, wine club swag etc.

Where to get a business loan: Lenders, banks and the SBA (application process to qualify).

Invoice Factoring
– Also Known as the Cash Advance

Having seasonal cash flow fluctuations can be a major issue when trying to grow a business. What I mean by this is if a business invoices a customer and in turn gets paid weeks after services are rendered or goods are shipped, there is a lack of consistent cash flow or immediate exchange of money for services. That business will still have to pay up front for supplies and labor, but the valuable cash flow is tied up in invoices leaving the bank account empty. One effective way to solve the cash flow crunch is with Invoice Factoring.

Invoice factoring is simple in how it works:

1. You sell your invoices to a factoring finance provider (like ILS).

2. Factoring provider advances you up to 95% of the invoice amount in 24 hours or as quick as same day.

3. Factoring provider collects full invoice amount from your customer(s).

4. Once your customer pays the factoring company (1 week- 6 months etc.) You get the remaining balance (minus a small factoring fee).

Many companies that often invoice other businesses have found invoice factoring to be an effective and consistent financial strategy for their business – keep reading to learn why.

Unexpected Expenses

Just about every business faces the surprise and stress of an unexpected cost and there isn’t enough cash on hand to manage. Invoice Factoring allows a business to quickly cover those unexpected costs.

Extension of Billing Department

It is common for back offices to struggle with keeping up on billing and collecting from customers. Or if your accounting department isn’t effective in making sure payments are received on time. Many Invoice Factoring partners act as an extension of your billing department so you can eliminate a headache of chasing down payments and focus on other things.

Essentially a cash advance, it’s your money you are just getting it faster!

Where to get Invoice Factoring: Specific Lenders whom offer Invoice Factoring Programs

You may be wondering what about investors, angel funds, cash advances, lines of credit, etc. We have not listed those as we find our customers often come to us in distress after taking on this type of obligation. There are many setbacks with giving away a portion or selling your soul to investors. Also, opening up to many business lines of credit (credit cards), can be a very dark hole to try and climb out of.

Equipment Financing, Working Capital Loans, and Invoice Factoring all have some commonalities and that is they each save your business thousands in capital, apply and receive funding as quick as same week, and most importantly save you from some serious financial mishaps that you may not be able to recover from.

Given that every business is unique, make sure to first consider all of your needs and options. We are a commercial lender and provide custom Equipment Financing Programs, Working Capital Loans and Invoice Factoring Programs. We are available for a free consultation to help you discover what financing product fits your business needs.

For more information visit
Innovative Lease Services, Inc.
online at www.ilslease.com

The Real Benefits of Financing: What are My Options?

By Angela Faringhy, Innovative Lease Services, Inc.

Financing Versus Equity Financing

Banks, Lenders, and Investors (oh my!) all exist because we fellow businesses need them. They sometimes can be the fine line between succeeding and closing the doors for good. Each of these entities, holders of large sums of money, provide capital.

In order to build new wineries, buy new equipment, develop new products, and upgrade information technology, businesses have to have money.

Banks, Lenders and Investors each have different financial structures and costs associated with using their money – also known as their “cost of doing business”. The beginning of the year is a popular time for companies to seek out financing assistance due to restructuring or restrategizing operations. No matter the goal, preparation and knowledge is the key to success.

Money Comes with a Price

Money is what we use to buy goods and services. There are many forms of monies in the world but here in the US we use the US Dollar. Not every dollar is treated equal. As a matter of fact every dollar, depending on where it comes from has its own price tag.

The cost of capital refers to your cost of making a specific investment and what you make in return. The basic formula for Cost of Capital is:

the amount of money (cost) and capital (cash) or
another infusion of equity into your business =
your businesses expenses and how much
you pay for it

Generally, business owners will not invest in new projects unless the return on the capital investment is greater than the cost of the capital. The cost of capital is key to all business decisions.

Continue to read up on the two most common ways a business can acquire money; Financing versus Equity Financing.

Equity Financing

Equity in business is the portion of the company’s assets that belong to the owners or stockholders. If a company uses funds provided by investors, then the cost of capital is known as the cost of equity.

Investors, angel funds, venture capitalists etc., all fall under the equity financing umbrella. In summary a business gives up a piece of their company’s equity to purchase cash to expand business and operations, essentially giving up a portion of ownership stake. These investors don’t actively participate in the daily management of the company, but they are active in strategic planning in order to reduce risks and maximize profits.

A popular example is the hit television series Shark Tank. Startup and established businesses alike come on the show seeking financial help, and are willing to negotiate a percentage stake of their business for a monetary investment from the “Sharks.” This is actually the most expensive form of financing. Here is an example why.

Let’s use John’s Packaging, a startup product packaging business. John needs about $100,000 for additional equipment and expenses to really get his business going. John finds an investor willing to provide the $100,000 in return for 20% stake in the company. Let’s fast forward five years, and John’s Packaging is a success valued at $5 million dollars. The 20% stake has grown to a value of 1 million dollars. That is a 1000% return on investment, great for the investor, not so great for John. In conclusion, John received all of the money he needed initially but later down the road realized the true value of what he had given up early on in the game.

Equity Financing is a top choice for a startup who is not necessarily pulling in monthly income quite yet and needs financial assistance to get operations up and running.

Financing

Referring to the cost of capital, Financing is known as cost of debt in the financing world. The word debt gets a bad rap, but it really shouldn’t always be considered a negative. Debt is when the borrower is required to repay the balance by a certain date. Good debt is an investment that will grow in value and generate long term income.

Equipment Financing and Leasing, Working Capital Loans, Cash Advances, and Invoice Factoring are the main products under the financing umbrella.

Financing is provided by lenders and banks. The cost of debt is the interest rate paid by the company on the financing amount. Interest rates are determined by a combination of elements; the current state of the market, how long a business has been operating, risk factors, credit scores, bank history and amount needed. An advantage is the fact that interest rate expenses are tax deductible and therefore more tax-efficient than equity financing. This form of financing is also able to provide services to a broader range of businesses across all industries with a variety of financial histories.

Financing differs from equity financing in that a business may acquire capital without giving away any portion of the business and essentially is utilizing a line of credit. Financing programs are structured to have fixed monthly payments over a 2 or 5 year horizon. You always know going in what your cost is going to be.

John’s Packaging, an 8 year old company needs capital to pay for replacement equipment costing $100,000. John qualifies for an Equipment Financing Program from a Private Lender, whom will provide all $100,000. In return John makes monthly payments for 24 months (also known as the terms) until the $100,000 is paid off. At the end of the term John owns the equipment and still owns 100% of his business.

Financing is a top choice for businesses who are in operation and can make the monthly payments.

In Summary

Partnering up with an investor is expensive, however investors can also provide invaluable industry expertise that may not be available from other resources.

Financing on the other hand is a shorter term investment to help boost business without restructuring or including more hands in the profit share.

The take away is for each and every business to spend time evaluating its true needs, and the potential cost of bringing an investor into the mix or taking out a line of credit.

Innovative Lease Services is a commercial lender and provider of custom Financing Programs.
Visit www.ilslease.com
or call 800-438-1470
for more information.

Adding a Financing Arm to Your B2B Business “aka” In-House Customer Payment Plans

By Angela Faringhy, Innovative Lease Services, Inc

With majority of business processes automated – payment plans are more readily available than ever before. This includes business goods, services, and consumer goods – almost everything under the sun can be financed.  With that being said it is crucial for a business to offer payment plans for products and services to keep up with competition and most importantly grow sales and increase revenue.  Commonly, a customer that wants or requires a finance option is often not going to share that with whom they are purchasing from. Keep in mind, 100% of your customers that pay cash are already doing so. So suppliers offering a financing option have the chance to convert more existing prospects into buyers.  As a private lender in the B2B space, read more to discover why one of the biggest mistakes a supplier or wholesaler of equipment can make is not providing alternative payment solutions to customers.

Customers will go to Competitors

When a business is greatly in need of business equipment and does not have the funds for it, they will always opt for an affordable option or a supplier whom offers payment plans.

A simple example: a winery’s 7 year old sprayer has given its last spray. The winery simply cannot afford not to get another sprayer immediately. Bugs, fertilizer, amongst other factors contribute to a ruined crop in a very short amount of time. And with no flexible budget to purchase a top of the line brand new machine outright – the winery will seek a supplier who provides some sort of payment plan because they cannot take the hit of such a financial burden at once, so unexpectedly. Next, the winery finds a supplier who lets them make small monthly payments for 24 months. This particular supplier whom offers payment options reaps the benefits of both worlds, selling to those businesses who cannot pay in full and those who can!

Customers Will Buy Less, When They Could Buy More

A grape grower is shopping for a new ripper in order to replant a diseased section for upcoming seasons. The grower is a repeat customer of S.C. Agriculture Equipment & Services, and wants to buy the same model ripper previously purchased. They have the money and are ready to pay in full. However S.C.’s Equipment offers financing now for all equipment and takes the opportunity to tell the grape grower about their new line of premium rippers. The premium line has new technology for better more efficient soil results. These rippers start at $5,000 more than the growers past model. However with payment plan options the grower can now afford one of the premium rippers! They decide to finance in order to upgrade to the higher end ripper. S.C. Agriculture Equipment & Services increased profits on an already secured customer.

Making all equipment affordable by different means of payment arrangements makes room for upselling and in turn more profit!

Common Concerns

Most commonly a business supplier of equipment will not have the financial resources to provide products upfront without being properly reimbursed at the time of transaction. Or typically the business does not want to take the risk of providing payment plans, which can have complications including; customers defaulting on their payments which leads to having to chase down the customer to get the equipment back, or taking further legal action. Thank goodness for collections!

Commercial Lenders and Equipment Leasing

This is where 3rd party Commercial Lenders come into play. A Commercial Lender is a financial institution which provides Financing programs that help support and increase the sales of their Vendor partners. These plans are commonly known as Vendor Financing, In-house Financing, White Label Financing, etc. Here, the lender acts as the de-facto financial arm for the Vendor and provides financing to its customers.

This becomes a real win-win-win for all three parties involved in the transaction. The Vendor gets to make the sale, the Lender gets to gain a new customer, and the end-user gets the equipment they need at the monthly payment that fits their budget.

Customers will experience significant benefits when financing with an independent lender, including speed of approval, limited or no financial information required, and the ability to structure custom payments and terms. For companies that have less-than-perfect credit, an independent lender is often the best solution as the credit windows are often significantly larger. What does this mean for the equipment supplier? Fast transactions and happy customers!

The typical Vendor Financing Program utilizes an Equipment Lease. The entity supplying the funding (also known as a Lender) basically purchases the equipment from the supplier and rents the equipment back to the Lessee (customer) for a low monthly fee. The lease can include cost of equipment, tax, shipping, installation and training. At the end of the lease the Lessee has the option to purchase the equipment for as little as $1 or start a new lease for the latest and greatest equipment models. Leases range from 12-72 month terms and can include seasonal payment provisions to help match the cash flows of the business.

For a customer that wants to own the equipment, most Independent Lenders will provide an Equipment Finance Agreement (EFA) whereby the customer is the owner of the equipment at the onset and the Lender is a Secured Party.

Wait…What About Banks?

Keep in mind, most bank loans will come with a requirement for a significant down payment, often as high as 10-20% of the equipment cost. And, bank loans usually only cover the equipment itself and do not include the installation, shipping, tax, and other “soft costs.” Timing is another factor that can greatly slow the process down. Banks can take weeks to decide on a loan approval for customers. Most importantly, a Bank does not lock in the specific Vendor into the transaction the way and Independent can, meaning your customer can take that approval to your competitor. ILS does not recommend sending customers to banks to get financing for business purchases.

Finding a Financing Partner

With many commercial lenders providing vendor programs, it is important to do the homework and research a partner whom can make the process as simple, seamless and speedy as possible. Most importantly seek out a partner that protects your sale throughout the process and does not charge you anything to be a partner – at ILS we call this “a no strings attached partnership.”

At ILS we have found that Vendors who did not previously offer a financing option can increase their prospect conversion rate by over 10%. Remember, most prospects are already sold on your equipment solution but unless they are a cash buyer they may not have the resources. By controlling the financing, you further control your sales.

About the Author:

 Innovative Lease Services, Inc. (ILS) is a private lender specializing in Vendor Financing Programs specifically in the agriculture, winery, brewing, and distilling industries. For more information or to enroll in the Vendor Program please call: 800-438-1470 or visit www.ilslease.com/equipment-lease/offer-financing.

Brokers See Themselves as ‘Bridge’ Between Growers, Wineries

By Jim Offner

Wine and grape brokers insist that their role transcend that of simple intermediary between grower and winery. Some involved in the process go so far as to eschew the term “broker” in describing what they do to bring the parties together.

“I don’t like the word broker; it sounds like a used car salesman, somebody who’s taking advantage of somebody who doesn’t know anything,” said Shannon Gunier, co-owner of Lower Lake, California-based brokering firm North Coast Winegrapes. “I like the word concierge because they help you find your way.”

Gunier, who, along with husband Rick, started her business in 2010, said the couple operates as the “eyes and ears” of their customers. “Use a broker if you’re unfamiliar with the region you’re buying from, you’re new in the business, and you don’t know where to get your fruit or bulk wine,” she said.

What to Expect From a Broker

Whatever the precise term, a broker’s job is multi-faceted, Gunier said. That includes finding the right wine grapes, bulk wines or shiners (finished wines that arrive at a winery unlabeled).

Brokers can also lead their customers through a complicated decision process, Gunier said. “First, make yourself a little familiar with what you’re trying to buy and what flavor profile you want.”

Expertise is stock and trade of the sharp broker, said Jim Smith, owner of Lakeport, California-based Case By Case Wine and Grape Brokers Inc. “Someone like myself who’s been around and has the connections and a third-party endorsement from a proven professional carries a lot of weight with buyers,” Smith said. “I can make a call and tell the winery, ‘If you have time, come up and look at this; otherwise, just go with me on this, and you’ll be glad.’”

A grower “who doesn’t know anybody” might cold-call a winery and try to sell grapes, but that tack rarely works, Smith said. “[A grower will say] ‘You want to take a chance on me?’ [The winery will} say no,” said Smith.

It’s also central to the broker’s job to be on top of all market trends, growing conditions, and supply issues, said Todd Azevedo, domestic broker for Ciatti Co., a global wine and grape brokerage firm based in San Rafael, California. “In any climate or economic terms, we have the most up to date info in today’s wine and grape world,” Azevedo said. “[We know] what’s going on import/export-wise, [and with] supply and demand. We have the most accurate information when you’re trying to sell your wine or grapes.”

Going through a broker isn’t required, of course, said Michael Colavita, owner of Stockton, California-based shipper F. Colavita & Son.  “Somebody can come to California and make a deal with a grower, and whatever product he comes up with, he ships it out.” Indeed, one winery operator who requested anonymity said he doesn’t need a broker. “I suppose there’s a place for it,” he said. “if you’re a bigger winery and you can afford it and don’t want to do a little work yourself, then fine. Or, if you’re going out of the country, you wouldn’t have the knowledge or resources to do it. But, If I’m knowledgeable about anything, why go through a third party?”

On the other hand, there are times when a grower isn’t equipped to or knowledgeable about how to ship their product, Colavita said. Brokers can work with shipping companies like Colavita & Son who have this know-how.

What to Consider When Choosing a Broker

Brokering grapes and wine is, above all, about relationships, Azevedo said. “Especially in the wine business, which is especially small around the world, it’s based on relationships and whom you believe will steer you in the right direction,” he said.

Having “eyes and ears” in “all major winegrowing regions” is a big advantage for the Ciatti Company’s clients. “We have 52 dedicated employees, a network of brokers. It’s up to us to discuss what’s happening in all these realms,” he said. “We’re involved in every region on a day-to-day basis.”

A broker who knows a lot about wine and everything that goes into the growing, buying and selling of grapes, has to be gifted in creating trusting relationships, Smith said. “It’s about personal relationships and trust. And trust is key.”

Integrity and a willingness to build lasting relationships between buyer and seller is a must for a successful broker, Smith insists. “I am very confident in stating we’re probably the most honest, we don’t try to hide anything,” he said. “We like everybody to show up at the vineyard and meet and greet. If you’re as trusted as we are, you can’t put a number to that value. If you’re a grower and have spent $120,000 on your operation, you need that trust.”

Gunier agrees that choosing a broker requires the right fit: “It should be somebody you have a rapport with. This is their biggest expenditure.”

A little research always is helpful, she said. “What they want to do is due diligence. Call them and ask questions,” she said. Test a broker’s efficiency, Gunier urges. “Order a sample of something and see how long it takes to get it,” she said. “If it takes long or they don’t respond, you’ll know. You’re sending money to somebody you don’t know, after all.”

A buyer or seller might be tempted to go with the most prominent brokers, but that’s not necessarily the best route, Smith said. “Of course, I would imagine most people, their first thought is let’s go with the biggest outfit, but if you’re not one of the biggest growers and you don’t have 500 tons to sell, they’ll give you a number,” he said. “Do you have 500 tons to sell? That’s great. They know they’re going to make a good chunk of money. I’ve always been a big proponent of the small to mid-size grower. I prefer to get a little more personal with the small or mid-sized grower and tend to shy away from the 500- to 1,000-ton growers.”

Reputation, not size, is what to look for in a broker, Smith said. “If you ask around, wherever you are, and a broker is not doing the right thing, somebody will know about it sooner or later,” he said. “It’s a small world and tiny industry. We all run in the same circles.”

Colavita said, as a shipper, he offers other advantages to customers. For example, he points to storage facilities that his company owns. “The advantage, since I own my own facilities, my staff can tell me these grapes won’t hold up, so don’t ship them out,” he said. “Let’s call it a hands-on type of operation. Of course, you’re dealing with Mother Nature; you never know what she’s going to do.”

A good broker can help minimize mistakes, Colavita said. “To deal with somebody who’s had a reputation of doing it right is an advantage, so they have confidence they’re going to get a suitable product for their needs.”

Customers anywhere can access Colavita’s services. “My customers are all over the country. I have some smaller California wineries who rely on me for a certain grape,” he said. “But, I have customers from here to Maine and Florida – all over.”

Brokers deal in the bulk-wine, processing and storage markets in addition to the growing sector, and that macro-view is essential, Azevedo said. “I’m trying to lessen the lumps of the economy, so you can go to your bank, investors and family and make wise financial decisions,” he said.

Know What You Want

Choosing the right broker depends on several factors, including whether a winery might be looking to buy “local” grapes, or find a product that isn’t available nearby. “People want to buy local, but they also want to buy Chardonnay, Merlot and Zinfandel because that’s what the market is drinking,” she said. “If the winery is familiar with the market and knows what’s local, they can do those deals direct. There probably aren’t many brokers able to provide that service outside of California.”

Case By Case supplies wineries inside and outside California, Smith said. “I think we’re in 27 states across the country now. If somebody wants a longer-term agreement for out of state that doesn’t have the highs and lows, it will be a little less money per ton, but a long-sure road.”

Brokers can help growers to develop a workable price for their product, Smith said. “There’s another type of grower that tries to take every penny,” he said. “They ask us to get this outrageous price. I try to talk them off the edge. Sometimes, they come in at the 11th hour and say we’ve just got to sell the fruit. They slash their price at the last minute. I’ve told them, don’t go for the throat; go for the profitable long-term contract.”

Contracts: To Do or Not To Do

Rules regarding broker contracts vary widely, Azevedo said. “Everybody is different,” he said. “There are some erroneous contacts where nobody wants the liability. The bigger, the more onerous the contacts get.”

It’s important to examine the so-called “boilerplate” in a contract because one never knows what it might contain, Azevedo said. “As a broker, you need to read through the fine print. Looking for hidden fees or penalties is a big deal. It’s so drastic across the board. I could send you four contacts and all the same price, but you go through the boilerplate it’s all drastically different.”

What a contract stipulates might hinge on various factors, Gunier said. “It depends on what you’re talking about,” she said. “If you’re talking about wine grapes, the broker will provide a contract; you make sure you have a contract in place. Ask the broker, ‘Send me a finished bottle of a product from a winery in your area, and I can see what that tastes like.’ I think it points to the fact that you have to have good grapes to have good wine. “

Gunier said she’ll next-day air-freight grapes to a client, but that’s just part of the picture.

“We take pictures all the way through,” she said. “We have people come out and talk to the growers. That’s kind of our niche.” It’s a kind of match-making business, Gunier said. “We try to match the winery and grower, and all that comes in the contract – when we’re going to pick, when we’ll ship,” she said. “How much damage should there be when you get the fruit? What if half is damaged? You have to have all that lined out in a contract.”

Smith said he likes to see “a couple of simple things” in contracts.

“Number one, our contracts are two pages,” he said. “I’ve seen corporate wineries with 14-page contacts. If they have 14-page contracts, they’ve had a team of lawyers that draw that up in their favor. I don’t mess around with those type of agreements. I tell the growers, ‘You make the decision.’” An example of an unfair agreement is one that might stipulate a “brix range,” with a per-ton penalty for anything outside the limits but no clause that reimburses the grower for a loss of fruit weight due to dehydration at the winery. “I won’t be party to that kind of agreement,” Smith said. “By sticking to my guns, 27 years later, I still don’t have to clock in and work for somebody else.” Any deal carries risk, and a broker should be willing to share in it, Smith said. “When those grapes show up like I said they would, I will expect your business every year,” he said.

Colavita said he hardly ever has contracts. “It’s all done through emails and confirmation of orders, that sort of thing,” he said. “The buying end of it, some of it is on a contract basis, some is yearly – it’s all over the board. Most of this business is just word of mouth.”

Negotiations Can Vary

Deal negotiations can vary, Azevedo said. “Any given year it can be different. We deal in a real-time market. This year, it’s strictly a buyer’s market. Demand is fairly low. Supply is steady, but because demand is so low, it feels like there’s a lot of grapes and wine on the market. So, growers at this point are looking for a deal, an offer from somebody to say yes or no to, because of the timing of the situation.”

Timing is crucial, where negotiations go because markets shift capriciously. “It depends on what time of season and where you are, other buyers in the vineyard, the economy, what’s happening on the international market and the bulk-wine market, what’s happening with cannabis, beer, coffee, whatever the preference is in that world,” Azevedo said. “In agriculture, especially, you’re up against time, because grapes are a perishable product.”

Some brokers will work for a basic commission; others don’t, Gunier said. “We don’t work that way; we purchase fruit from growers and sell it,” she said. “We take some of the risk away from growers.”

Larger brokers are more likely to work on a percentage basis, Gunier said. “Those are big guys who can work on two percent selling 80 tons; our minimum order is six tons, which is a third of a truck.”

In negotiations, there are times when a grower needs to have a feel for the right deal, and the wrong one, Smith said. “In a hot market, say Cabernet Sauvignon, I’d say the power leans to the grower,” he said. “His price keeps going up. I’m on the back side of that, and I warn him not to push too hard, or he might lose a long-term buyer. When the market is in the tank, there were grapes on the vine because the tanks were full, growers were offering $350 a ton for their grapes. I was able to go around with a handful of growers we were working with and [find out what] they needed to break even and make a very marginal profit.”

Smith said his company’s customer retention is right at 99 percent, so it’s doing something right. “Working closely with our buyers, understanding what they need and trying to accomplish it – that’s our specialty,” he said.

When are Multiple Brokers Needed?

There may be times to call on more than one broker, but the odds are, a grower ultimately will come to rely on one, Azevedo said. “Personal opinion here: Because it’s a relationship-driven business and you’re building confidence in a person to be a partner in what you’re trying to achieve, it’s probably best to deal with only one,” he said. “As a winery, you’d be doing yourself a disservice if you don’t find out what the market is and what you can achieve. As a producer, I want to make sure I cover all my bases, in order to have all the information. Lo and behold, you’re probably going to go back to the same person who has given you all the information over and over again.”

Whether to work with more than one broker depends on the circumstances, Gunier said. “I think you should work with people who are willing to work with you,” she said. “You have to navigate your way through that.”

Going “local” with a broker might be the right solution in some circumstances, Gunier said. “The guy I’d be concerned about is the guy who can get you anything from anywhere,” she said, laughing.

A large-scale vineyard might bring in multiple brokers, Smith said. “If it’s a 1,000-acre vineyard, you might consider working with at least a couple brokers,” he said. “You might find you like one more than the other.”

Tariffs, Tariffs, and More Tariffs

By Dan Minutillo, Esq.

Toward the end of this week, take a minute to add up and total the amount of US tariffs imposed on Chinese goods imported into the US. You can glean this data from online aggregated digital news, television news, or from US Government pronouncements about Trump tariffs.

I would be very surprised if the number does not exceed hundreds of billions of US dollars encompassing about half of all Chinese manufactured goods entering the US. The public comment period for most US-China tariffs to be imposed to date ended this past Friday so that such tariffs can be imposed by the US Government and will either be at 25% or 10% depending on the Chinese manufactured product.

China and the US, up to this point, have enjoyed a robust trading partner experience. China is the most active trading partner with the US at about $500 billion of Chinese goods sold to the US last year. These US-China tariffs to be imposed on our most active trading partner are meant to hurt the Chinese economy for alleged unfair trade practices, misappropriating US intellectual property, and generally misbehaving in the world of international trade to the detriment of the US. China has threatened to match and retaliate against the US with equal trade sanctions on US products.

Options

US companies have four (4) primary options to avoid these Trump lead tariffs on imported Chinese goods:

  1. Find a supplier and manufacturer other than China for the goods;
  2. Pay the tariff as the importer of record;
  3. File for a US Customs classification arguing that these tariffs do not apply to its goods imported from China; or
  4. Apply for exclusion from these tariffs.

Context

For context, the exporter of record is the company or individual who is listed on export documentation as the person or entity moving product from country “A” to country “B”. The country of export is the place which the product moved from.

A product could be subject to a US-China tariff even though the product was not exported from China. Products manufactured in China (made in China) are subject to the Trump tariffs even if those products took a circuitous route to reach the shores of the US.

The importer of record is responsible for paying these Trump tariffs on Chinese goods. The importer of record is usually the buyer or distributor of the imported goods, so, 1 through 4 noted above are options for the importer of Chinese goods, that is for the US company importing Chinese goods into the US.

If the US importer decides on option 2, that is to pay the tariff as the importer of record; then it has two primary options:

  1. To absorb the cost of the tariff thereby cutting into profits; or
  2. To increase the price of the product subject to the tariff and pass this increase, either in full or in part, onto its customers thereby risking market share.

USHTS Codes

How do you determine if a product is subject to Trump’s US-China tariff?

This is where it gets a bit tricky. The “Lists” of products subject to US tariffs on China’s products are categorized by the United States Harmonized Tariff Schedule (USHTS) code system. This system categorizes products by product type and then provides multiple subcategories with further particular specified descriptions. The object is first to find the general product category on the USHTS code schedule and then continue to drill down to subcategories on this schedule until a full description of the subject product is found.

A clear, simple and definite example of a USHTS code is for laptop computers which fit into USHTS 8471.30.01.00 as automatic data processing machines that are portable, with certain weight restrictions. This USHTS code categorization is easy.

However many of the USHTS categories are confusing, to understate. For example, run a web search for “Clocks and Watches US HTS Code” and then compare the HTS data and codes that appear relating to a watch which you own then try to determine the exact US HTS code for that watch. This exercise will give you an idea about how difficult it could be to determine USHTS code and then to determine if a product is covered on one of the US-China tariff lists with high US tariff ramifications based on the USHTS code.

Requesting a Customs Classification

If a company is not sure where their product fits in the USHTS Code classification system, it can submit a description of the subject product with backup data requesting that US Customs provide an HTS classification for that product. US Customs will evaluate the information provided and assign a USHTS Code for that product. The company then merely looks at the USHTS Code table and the applicable US-China tariff lists to determine the applicable tariff amount, if any, for that product.

Requesting an Exclusion

If it appears that the product is subject to the Trump US-China tariff, the US Government has established certain procedures in the event a company believes that its product should be excluded from the US-China tariff. In order to qualify for such exclusion, in addition to following the procedures outlined in the Government’s pronouncements about exclusions, the company must prove that:

  1. The product is only available in China; or
  2. The duties imposed would cause “severe economic harm;” to the company; or
  3. The product is not strategically important to China or related to Chinese industrial programs including, in particular, the Chinese program “Made in China 2025.”

As noted, the US Government has instituted an avenue for clarification of the HTS code for a product and an avenue to request exclusion if a product appears on one of the US-China import tariff lists. Neither avenue might satisfy the company struggling to pay or “pass on” a high US-China tariff to its customers, but at least these avenues provide an opportunity for relief.

—————————————————————————————————————

Dan has practiced law in Silicon Valley since 1977. The Firm’s practice is limited to regulatory law, government contract law, and international trade law matters. Dan has received the prestigious “Silicon Valley Service Provider of the Year” award as voted by influential attorneys in Silicon Valley.He has represented many very large global companies and he has worked on the massive US Government SETI (Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence) project as well as FOEKE (worldwide nuclear plant design certification), the Olympic Games, the first Obama town hall worldwide webinar, among other leading worldwide projects.

Dan has lectured to the World Trade Association, has taught law for UCLA, Santa Clara University Law School and their MBA program, lectured to the NPMA at Stanford University, and for the University of Texas School of Law.

Dan has lectured to various National and regional attorney associations about Government contract and international trade law matters. He has provided input to the US Government regarding the structure of regulations relating to encryption (cybersecurity). He has been interviewed about international law by the Washington Post, Reuters and other newspapers.

He is the author of four books unrelated to law, one of which was a best seller for the publisher, and of dozens of legal articles published in periodicals, technical and university journals distributed throughout the world. He serves as an expert witness in United States Federal Court regarding his area of expertise.

MINUTILLO’s e-newsletter and all of its content is provided for information and very general purposes only. It is not intended to provide or offer any specific or general legal advice, or to create an attorney-client relationship. Before acting or relying on any information provided in this e-newsletter, consult an attorney who is an expert in the appropriate field of law.

Copyright © 2018 Minutillo, APLC, All rights reserved.

841 Blossom Hill Road, Second Floor
P.O. Box 20698
San Jose, CA 95160
Tel.: (408) 226-4049
Email: dan@minutillolaw.com
Website: www.minutillolaw.com

Protecting Your Business From Employee Poachers

By Brian D. Kaider, Esq.

You’ve been in business for several years and have a dozen hard-working, dedicated employees working for your company, or so you think.  Out of the blue, a new competitor enters the market and the next thing you know, all 12 of your employees have jumped ship to join the new firm.  With them, they have taken company records and customer lists.  What do you do?  Do you have any legal recourse against the poaching company? Against your former employees?  How could you have prevented this?

Can a Competitor “Poach” Your Employees?

In most states, yes.  Many people are surprised to learn that, generally, poaching is a perfectly valid and legal way to find new employees. There are exceptions and limitations, of course, but the overall policy favoring poachers is that courts do not want to unduly restrict a person’s ability to seek employment in a competitive marketplace.

An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure

The best defense against poachers is to create an environment in which your employees are happy and will be reluctant to leave.  That does not necessarily mean having the highest salaries in your business, though compensation is certainly one factor.  More important, though, is creating a culture of inclusion, where employees feel that they are valued members of a team, where they are challenged and know they will be rewarded for excellent performance.

Contractual Protections

There are many types of agreements that can help prevent poaching, but they generally fall into two broad categories; non-compete agreements and non-disclosure agreements.  These may be stand-alone contracts, or may be integrated as clauses in an employment agreement.

  • Non-Compete Agreements: Can be a valuable asset in protecting your workforce, because if certain conditions are met, a poaching company may be liable for “tortious interference of contract” between you and your employee. But, the first element of that legal claim is the existence of a valid contract. There’s the rub.  Many states, California in particular, disfavor non-compete agreements as an undue restriction on someone’s freedom to seek employment.  So, these contracts must be drafted carefully and narrowly tailored to your company’s specific circumstances so as not to create an unfair burden on the employee.

For instance, if you are in an industry where you have dozens of competitors within 20 miles of your business, then a restriction in your employment agreement prohibiting a departing employee from working for a competitor within 5 miles of your business might be considered reasonable.  But, if you have only one competitor in your state, and that competitor is 10 miles away, then a restriction in your employment agreement prohibiting a departing employee from working for a competitor within 20 miles would almost certainly be deemed unreasonable by the court.

  • Non-Solicitation Agreements: One form of non-compete agreement, however, is much more readily enforced; a non-solicitation agreement. This contract prohibits a departed employee from attempting to convince other employees to leave. While this can be very helpful in preventing a mass exodus, here too, the restrictions must be reasonable.  A prohibition from contacting other employees for six months following termination would more likely be enforced than such a prohibition for five years.  Note, however, that this agreement applies only to the departing employee; it does nothing to prevent the competitor from contacting more of your employees directly.

Even in the absence of a written non-solicitation agreement, in most jurisdictions, a current employee has a duty of loyalty to his/her employer.  This duty prohibits an employee who plans to leave from soliciting co-workers to leave at the same time.  The employee may, however, announce his departure and if co-workers approach him to inquire about the new employer, that is not a violation of the employee’s duty.

  • Non-Disclosure Agreements: While it may be difficult to prevent an employee from going to a competitor, often it isn’t the departure of the employee itself that is of concern to the employer, it’s the risk that the departing employee will provide confidential or trade secret information to the competitor. Fortunately, non-disclosure agreements are very common and widely enforceable.

There are many types of confidential and trade secret information, such as client lists, marketing and distribution plans, growth strategies, pricing structures, recipes, business methods, etc.  These are all valuable assets that should be protected by non-disclosure agreements with your employees.  The key to successful enforcement of these agreements, however, is that you yourself must treat the information as confidential and secret.  This means limiting distribution of the information within your organization to only those who need it to perform their jobs and not disclosing the information to anyone outside the organization (except lawyers, accountants, and other service professionals you have hired to support your business).  Further, you should ensure that hard copies of confidential information is kept under lock and key and electronic records are password protected with as few employees having access as is practical.

What Can You Do?

One or more of your employees has left for a competitor; what do you do?  First, take a breath.  You can’t keep all of your employees forever, people will come and go.  So take stock: how much does this departure hurt your business?  Did the employee have access to confidential or trade secret information?  Was the employee close friends with any of their coworkers in your employ?

If the employee has given you notice, but not left yet, meet with them.  Let them know they will be missed, but remind them of their duty of loyalty while they remain with you.  Identify the confidential information they have been privy to and discuss what may and may not be communicated to their new employer. If the employee received hard copies or electronic files that you consider confidential or secret, ask the employee to sign a sworn statement that they will return or destroy all copies.  If the employee is unwilling to sign such a statement or gives you indicia of hostility toward you or your company, consider terminating them on the spot.  Depending on the circumstances, you may have to pay their salary if you have a contractual notice period for termination, but at least they will have no further access to your confidential information or direct communication with your other employees.

If the employee has already left and you believe that they have taken confidential or trade secret documents and/or provided such information to their new employers, you must act quickly in order to protect your rights.  Below are some examples of legal actions to take.

Breach of Contract

If you and your employee had a written contract (non-compete or non-disclosure) you can take legal action against the employee for breach of contract.  You will need to demonstrate three elements: the existence of a valid contract, that the terms of the contract were violated by the former employee, and that the breach caused or will cause economic harm.  As discussed above, particularly for non-compete agreements, the contract must be reasonably drafted for the court to consider it valid.

Tortious Interference with Contract

If there is a valid contract with the employee, you may also be able to take action against the competitor for tortious interference with the contract.  This cause of action has five elements that must be satisfied:  1) the contract must be valid, 2) the competitor must have knowledge of the contract, 3) the competitor must intend for the new employee to breach the contract, 4) the terms of the contract must actually be breached, and 5) you must be damaged by the breach.

The second element, requiring actual knowledge of the contract by the competitor may seem a little tricky.  As a first step before filing a legal action, you can send the competitor a cease and desist letter describing the nature of the contract (non-compete, non-disclosure, etc.) and how you believe that contract will be violated by the competitor’s continued behavior.  If the competitor continues, then you can proceed with the legal action and your letter will provide proof of actual knowledge of the contract.

The most difficult element of the claim is that of damages.  In cases where you can directly tie the breach to a loss in sales, economic damages may be easy to define.  That is seldom the case, however, so seeking equitable remedies such as preventing the employee from working for the competitor may be a better approach.

Breach of Duty of Loyalty

In the absence of a non-compete/non-solicitation agreement your employees still owe you a duty of loyalty.  While the language may vary state to state, essentially the employee owes a duty to act with good faith in the furtherance of the employer’s interests  If a departing employee actively solicits others to join the new company, copies files to bring to the new company, deletes or sabotages data to inhibit your business operations, or otherwise acts in a manner that is hostile to your company, they violate this duty.  Damages may include lost profits and also punitive damages if you can demonstrate that the breach of duty was willful.

Misappropriation of Trade Secrets

Though the language of what constitutes a trade secret varies state-to-state, it is generally information that 1) is not known to the public, 2) derives independent economic value, and 3) is subject to secrecy, meaning that you have to actively maintain its secrecy.  The classic example of a trade secret is a recipe, such as the formula for Coca-Cola® or the Kentucky Fried Chicken® secret blend of 11 herbs and spices.  But, the general skills, knowledge and expertise an employee acquires through experience in the field, even while working for you, are the employee’s assets, not yours.  So, pricing information committed to their memory through servicing your clients is not protectable.  But, if they access and download a password protected pricing strategy on the company’s server and bring that information to a competitor, that would be a misappropriation.

Unfair Competition

Although poaching employees is generally a legitimate and legal business practice, there are limitations. For example, except in very specific and highly skilled fields, it is uncommon for one company to employ all of the competent people in the field.  So, while it is not per se illegal to recruit more than one employee from a competitor, engaging in a pattern of solicitation of a single company’s employees may be evidence of intent to destroy the competitor’s business or a crucial department thereof and may be actionable unfair competition.  To prevail on an unfair competition claim, you must demonstrate that the loss of key personnel will harm the company and that the competitor intended to drive you out of business. For example, if the competitor offers salaries to your entire sales team that are well-above market rate, that may be evidence of a bad faith attempt to cripple your business.

Summary

The law generally favors a person’s freedom to seek employment and is skeptical of efforts to restrict that freedom.  Nevertheless, an employer has the right to loyalty from current employees and is protected from efforts to unfairly undermine its business by stealing secret information or luring away its entire workforce.  Whether concerned with protecting trade secret information from departing employees or exposure to legal liability when recruiting a competitor’s workers, early consultation with an attorney is always a wise approach.

Brian Kaider is a principal of KaiderLaw, an intellectual property law firm with extensive experience in the craft beverage industry.  He has represented clients from the smallest of start-up breweries to Fortune 500 corporations in the navigation of regulatory requirements, drafting and negotiating contracts, prosecuting trademark and patent applications, and complex commercial litigation.

bkaider@kaiderlaw.com

 (240) 308-8032

Wines of the New World: Peru

By Neal Johnston

dreamstime_l_52607737

The earliest recorded historical evidence of setllements in the countries of the new world, also known as the Americas were attempts at colonisation made by the Europeans in as far back as the tenth century. During long voyages of exploration, Scandanavian ‘Norse’ saiors built the very first settlements of the Americas, in Greenland and Canada. Chrsitopher Columbus expanded on the idea having sailed west when he established a new trade route to reach the far east. He inadvertantly landed in what came to be known to the Europeans as The New World.
Spanish speaking Peru is one of the countries that make up the Americas, or New World, and it is showing great potential to becoming one of the newest and emerging wine producing regions in the global wine market today. Wine makers are keeping their eyes and ears firmly planted on the ground in Peru as they stay on the lookout for available plots of land for new working vineyards. The Peruvian population is estimated at just over thirty one million as recorded in 2015. This includes American Indians, Europeans, Africans and Asians. A heady mixture that has resulted in a wide diversity of expressions in different fields including art, cuisine, literature, and music. A multi ethnic society like this means much greater diversification not only demographically, but both creatively and in terms of cultural influence as well. Building on these combined cultural influences is perhaps in many ways key to understanding and contemplating Peru’s future potential as a diverse, engaged and competitive breeding ground for viticulture on the international stage. Variety is after all the spice of life and this particular melting pot of cultures lends it self towards ingenuity and exploration. Viniculture in 2016 not only in Peru but in many other countries of the New World is becoming more inventive and innovative by the day.

One very beneficial feature Peru shares with another great wine producing country, Chile, is that it is set at the very same high altitude and therefore benefits well from the weather influences of the South Pacific Ocean. Peru’s vineyards are maintained throughout five different regions. The North, Central and South Coasts, the Andean Sierra, and the Selva. There are a grand total of eleven thousand hectares of vineyards throughout Peru, however this number will keep changing as viticulturalists continue to hone in on and explore more ambitiously the future prospects of some of the Central and South Coasts’ best known grape varieties. These include Tacama, Vista Alegre and Ocucaje.

This is good news for the future of wines of the new world and is both refreshing and encouraging, like a breath of fresh air for the industry. The Pacific coastal region of Peru is comprised mainly of desert. This barren and isolated landscape is undulated by a series of valleys flowing down from the Andes Mountains toward the sea. These fertile irrigated areas in valleys can hold cool currents of sea air which means that the balance between the humidity and temperatures can fluctuate significantly daily. This provides good enough weather for perfect growing conditions. The terrain is characterized by the natural diversity of its inner and outer landscapes.

While Peru’s shores are lapped by the Pacific Ocean the Altiplano High plateau sits at an average height of three thousand seven hundred and fifty metres above sea level, and then plunges downwards to meet the deep tropical rainforests of the Amazon. Peru has one of the world’s most complex river systems and it is in the Peruvian highlands that the great Amazon River begins.

Peruvian territory was once home to the ancient cultures from the Norte Chico civilization in Caral, one of the oldest in the world to the Inca Empire, the largest known state in Pre-Columbian America. The Spanish Empire successfully conquered the region in the 16th century. Peru’s independence was formally proclaimed some two hundred years later in 1821. The representative democratic republic of Peru today is divided into twenty five individual regions. This is an evolving country with a higher than average human development index score, and a poverty level of around twenty five percent. Some of its main economic activities include mining, manufacturing, agriculture and fishing.

Peru’s climate lies outside of the southern wine belt, the band of latitude that encircles the southern hemisphere of between thirty and forty five degrees in which quality viniculture is considered practicable. The wine belt theory was posited in an era when some parts of the New World were reliant almost entirely on their domestic consumption alone, with very little financial motivation for change and development. The altitude and maritime influences are not accounted for by the wine belt. More so the wine belt relies entirely on latitudinal information which does not take in to consideration Peru’s coastal plains. Yet it is precisely here that Peruvian viticulture has found a safe haven, between the cooling waters lapping in form the edge of the Pacific Ocean and the Andean peaks as they rise to heights of ten thousand feet or more within just a few miles of the coast itself.

On the coastal plains surrounding the city of Pisco we discover the heartland of Peruvian wine production. Just over one hundred and twenty five miles south of the capital, Lima, Pisco is at the centre of Peru’s Pacific coastline. On either side of this are the towns of Chincha, Ica, Moquegua and Tacna. These are Peru’s viticulture hot spots. Ica is known locally as the land of the sun, an oasis of fertile land on the northern edges of the Atacama Desert where a great abundance of vineyards are separated from barren desert by a matter of just yards. The grape varieties used in Peruvian winemaking are well adapted to warm-climate viticulture. Grenache and red-fleshed Alicante Bouschet are two very popular varieties. Cabernet Sauvignon is also become increasingly more popular along with Bordeaux Malbec, which has proved to be very successful in exports to Argentina. Light-skinned Torrontes is another esteemed white wine variety, which goes under the local name of Torontel.

Along with Sauvignon Blanc and various forms of Muscat these are some of the brands that define Peru at this point in time. These particular grape varieties are well known for their ability to thrive in open warmer climates. ‘Pisco’ is a grape brandy quite like Italy’s Grappa. It also happens to be Peru’s national drink of choice and is heavily contested as being the nation’s favourite beverage in neighbouring Chile as well. The clear grape brandy wine is exported from Peru and it is considerably more successful and popular than the country’s domestic wine to most Peruvians. The famous beverage also benefits from a reliable domestic consumer base.

As Peru’s wine makers are learning more about individual wines they are also gaining further recognition of their products outside of Latin America. Production is completed on a relatively small scale for the most part and Peru would like their finer wines to be able to compete more in the future of the international market. Santiago Queirolo Winery’s Intipalka, is one of few Peruvian wines which is exported to the U.S. Europe and China respectively. Ocucaje is another top producer which has gained wide recognition after it won a silver medal for its esteemed Cabernet Sauvignon at the 2012 Vinalies Internationales in France.

Peru’s winemaking legacy has its origins in the sixteenth century. Following the Spanish conquest Peru was the first South American country in which systematic viticulture, the technical term for the cultivation of the grapevine was actively encouraged. Vines were planted in coastal areas with the majority being placed around Ica, a region just south of Lima. Over the years, pests and politics have reduced the country’s vineyards from 125,000 acres in the nineteenth century, to little more than 2,500 acres by the 1980s. But as Llanos Goyena notes, once economic stability returned to Peru at the turn of the millennium so too did a renewed interest in winemaking.

Peru’s rich and varied cuisine includes a wide range of ingredients including maize, tomatoes, potatoes, avocado, and exotic fruits like the chirimoya, lúcuma and pineapple. A typical Peruvian dish is ‘Ceviche’ which is a combination of fish and shellfish marinated in citrus juices. Another popular dish is Pachamanca which is a combination of meat, tubers and beans cooked slowly to perfection in an enlarged stone oven. Peruvian food can be accompanied by typical drinks like the ‘chicha de jora’.

A unique type of beer made by germinating maize, extracting the malt sugars, boiling the wort, and fermenting it in large vessels, traditionally huge earthenware vats for several days. There are also chichas made from purple corn and peanuts. Since the 1980’s Peru has made a concerted effort at revamping its wine making business and expanding on its development. Productivity in 2016 is placed well within the realms of a country that could soon be in the running for best South American wine exporter.

With the unprecedented level of innovation and experimentation that the global wine industry has been experiencing in recent years the future course for development is looking good not only for Peru but for much of the rest of the new world as well. Hot on the heels of climate change meteorological expert opinion would tend to agree almost unanimously that the great variety of new, unexpected and dramatic shifts in today’s weather will more than likely significantly affect the global wine industry’s future course for development. While further scientific discoveries are being made in accordance with these changes these discoveries will help to pave the way for a better, brighter and even more prosperous future for the wines of the new world.

Ontario’s First Wine in a Can

By Phillip Woolgar

dreamstime_xl_24732244

Of all the things we find on the label of a bottle of wine, perhaps most important is the appellation. Getting down to the heart of the matter, the appellation is simply the wine’s address. It’s where the grapes were grown. This simple fact of where grapes were grown gives an oenophile a deep understanding of what’s inside the bottle or can. Yes, the bottle or can!

A can of wine on the store shelf cannot yet be called ubiquitous, but that day may be coming. More wine is found in cans every day. Barokes Wines of Australia claim to have been the first to can wine, inventing their own process in 1996. The Francis Ford Coppola Winery in California released their Sophia Blanc du Blanc in cans in 2004. Now, brothers Greg and Yannick Wertsch, owners of Ontario’s Between the Lines Winery, along with their partners Philip Chae and Lucian Cao, have just introduced their own wine in cans, the first in the region- Origin sparkling wine.

Greg and Yannick were 25 and 22 years old when they started Between the Lines in 2010. They were the youngest wine makers in the area, but between them they had attended wine making school in Germany and Ontario for ten years. They began their winery by renting a building on their parents’ family farm, and finding an investor who paid for tanks, labels, and glassware. The launch was in November 2011.

Early on, the brothers made the kinds of wine everyone knows, wines that originated, were developed, and became famous in other parts of the world. They soon felt disappointed with the results of trying to make a wine in Ontario that was better suited to another region. They decided to go change course. “We wanted to create something that would be “Ontario” for a long time,” explained Greg. Between the Lines’ appellation is 100 percent Niagara Peninsula.

For centuries, wine makers have recognized the influence of place on wine. Where grapes grow, the particular environment contributes to making those grapes unique to that very location. These conditions are often referred to as terroir, and the region as an appellation.

Canada now recognizes eight appellations or wine making regions: Ontario’s three- Lake Erie North Shore, Niagara Peninsula, and Prince Edward County; and Nova Scotia, Okanagan, Similkameen, Naramata Bench, and Vancouver Island.

The Vintners Quality Alliance (VAQ) is the authority on appellations in Ontario. The VQA website (vqaontario.ca) discusses the importance of appellation. “The physical features of land and climate – the nuances of soil and sun; the minerality and taste characteristics of diverse landscapes – influence the choice of vine cultivars and viticultural practices across Ontario, and create unique conditions for the production of grapes and wine.

As wineries and winemakers cultivate, interpret and elaborate terroir through wine production, they in turn shape our tastes and interaction with the land.” Ontario’s Niagara Peninsula has more acreage devoted to wine than any other viticulture area of Canada. Forty-six varietals are grown on 13,600 acres. The terroir is dominated by fresh water, with the Niagara River to the east, the Welland River to the south, and Lake Ontario to the north. The area’s soil was shaped over 200,000 years by glacial and interglacial events that resulted in thick layers of clay, silt, and sand. The area has a cool climate, with wide shifts of temperature from day to night.
Winds extend the growing season into late fall by bathing vineyards in air that has warmed over the summer-heated lake. In the spring, air that has cooled over the winter-chilled water is blown over the vineyards slowing the warming, and delaying budding until after any late frosts.

This is the Niagara region where Greg and Yannick grew up on the family farm where their dad grew grapes for other vintners. As boys, both Greg and Yannick planned to leave the farm. Gregg enrolled in a few semesters of microbiology, and Yannick did the same with computer science, but their roots reached too deep into the Ontario soil. Sitting at a desk just didn’t satisfy either of them. They quickly realized that wine was their future.
The idea for offering wine in cans was Greg’s. “I studied wine making in Germany. They had sparkling wine in cans. The US has Sophia. There was nothing like it in Ontario.” He didn’t have to convince Yannick. Yannick’s a wine maker. He makes wine. He doesn’t argue about what his wine gets put into.

The process of going from “idea” to actually holding a can of Origin wine this past January took four years. It began with the most obvious question, what wine will we can?

Greg’s choice? “I wanted to use vidal.”
Vidal is a white hybrid that is tough enough to thrive in the cold weather of Canada. Vidal was developed by Frenchman Jean Louis Vidal for use in the production of cognac. The grape is now at home in Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, and British Columbia, and the northeastern United States. It is a primary choice for ice wine, and is so approved by Canada’s Vintner’s Quality Alliance.

As the canning project progressed, it grew. Greg soon found he needed partners. That’s when he called on his partners Lucian and Philip to join him. Lucian and Philip had been students of Greg while he was teaching at Niagara University. They were very enthusiastic about the idea and quickly signed on.

The team next considered the can. What about it?
Canning wine is still so uncommon that the issues, though simple, are not widely known. There are three considerations: don’t touch my wine with metal; keep the gas, lose the air; and don’t make vidal bombs. That is, contain the pressure!

First, aluminum flavored wine? Aluminum cans are now lined with materials that are the latest innovations in science. These new materials have revolutionized the canned beverage industry. Beer and soda cans are also now lined. Canned beer is quickly being recognized (and tasted) as every bit the equal of bottled. Enough canned wine has already been tasted, that wine lovers can be comfortable that this problem is solved. There’s no aluminum in canned wine.

Next, “contains no oxygen”. “We want our sparkling wine drunk as soon as it’s bought,” Greg says. “Origin” is not meant to age in the can. This means that oxygen slowly creeping into the can the way it does through a cork is not a major problem. Still, (no pun intended), sparkling wine is sparkling. You don’t want the sparkle escaping. A sparkling beverage in a leaky container will slowly but steadily become a still beverage. A can of wine is sealed air-tight. Nothing gets in, and nothing gets out.

This sealing is accomplished by a remarkable machine system. At Between the Lines they do the canning themselves. The system first cools the wine which then is poured into a can that has no top at all. The can is filled to overflow so that there is no air in it. The lid is put over the can and sealed. Nothing inside but wine.

What about the pressure? Relax. The can is fine. Between the Lines orders their cans from the Ball Corp. Ball, located in Broomfield, Colorado makes a lot of cans. Their 2014 sales totaled $8.6 billion US. Between the Lines cans were custom designed and tested by Ball. Although Origin is meant to be drunk within days of purchase, the can is designed to hold its contents for a couple of years. Ball also pointed out a happy bonus of canning. Cans are 100 percent recyclable.

Of all the containers used for beverages, the aluminum can is the most recyclable. Arriving at a can that works is just the can’s beginning. Next, there is the very important matter of how it looks. Greg was aware of the “ideas” about canned wine. Many people who love wine are still concerned about the quality of a wine that is distributed the same way soda and cheap beer are. “We needed a can that didn’t look like beer or soda,” Greg remembered.

The Origin can is narrow compared to the typical
beer or soda. It’s relatively tall and thin, much more graceful and elegant than the typical six pack. The colors are also not the typical bright blue, red, or green. The Origin can is white with gold detail. It’s much more in keeping with the image of the wine which is described on the Between the Lines website (betweenthelineswinery.com) as, “an aromatic sparkling wine crafted with a kiss of Vidal Icewine. Pale gold with aromas of bright stone fruit and citrus, a crisp acidity runs across the palate to give a lingering and refreshing finish. A fine balance of sweetness and perlage, the mouth feel is savoury, soft, and smooth. Tickling the palate with a sweet effervescence of peach, apricot, and honey and a clean citrus finish.” In a can!

In matters of wine, as much as anywhere else, talk is cheap. The test is the taste. The only way to know that canning wine is really working is to open a can and taste it. For that, you’ve got to go to Between the Lines in Ontario, or shop on their website, betweenthelineswinery.com.

Tidal Bay of NS is a Matter of Quality Over Quantity

By Phillip Woolgar

Luckett_Vineyards_Gaspereau_Valley_Nova_Scotia_Canada

More than 55,000 wine professionals from all over the world attended the ProWein International Trade Fair for Wines and Spirits in Dusseldorf, Germany last March. This year for the first time, these enthusiasts were able to taste the wines from one of the newer wine making regions of the world, Nova Scotia.

Wine making in Nova Scotia can be traced back to the 1600s, but the modern industry is only 38 years old. It began in 1978 when Roger Dial created Grand Pre Winery which today is Hanspeter Stutz’s Domaine de Grand Pre. In the same year, Hans Jost planted vines on the Malagash Peninsula which eventually became the Devonian Coast winery. The Winery Association of Nova Scotia was created in 2002.

Though still small by old world standards, Nova Scotia’s wine industry is growing aggressively. A press release from the Nova Scotia premier’s office of March 29, 2016 stated, “There are 23 wineries and 94 grape producers in Nova Scotia, and the industry accounts for $7.3 million in wages annually.” The province is determined to see the industry grow into an international player. It is putting money behind the words.

That press release announced the funding of a research lab at Acadia University in Wolfville, N.S. Mr. Ray Ivany, president and vice-chancellor of Acadia University explained the intended purpose of the project. “This new lab,” said Mr. Ivany “will allow us to contribute even more to the award-winning wine and agri-food industries in our region.”

In announcing the lab’s funding, Nova Scotia Premier Stephen McNeil hinted at the vision of the future of NS wines’ international markets when he said, “Nova Scotia’s wine industry has potential for tremendous growth that will lead to more jobs and more exports and our goal is to assist it where we can. It’s important to have quality lab services, especially as we look to the future of export.”

President Scott Brison of the Treasury Board of Canada has also indicated he’s got his eye on markets beyond Nova Scotia’s Atlantic coast when he said, “Canada is an emerging player in the global wine market. This investment [in the new lab] will support the wine industry in Atlantic Canada.”

As part of the same growth effort, Nova Scotia joined Canada’s other significant provincial wine producers, British Columbia and Ontario on the nation’s ProWein team. The Canadian participation in ProWein was organized by the government of Canada, the Canadian Vintners’ Association, the Wine Marketing Association of Ontario, the British Columbia Wine Institute, and the Winery Association of Nova Scotia (WANS).

Gillian Mainguy, manager of WANS was heavily involved in the selection of Nova Scotia’s representatives. “The efforts to include Nova Scotia came early in the [national] planning cycle,” Ms. Mainguy remembered. “I reached out to the member wineries of WANS to ask if anyone was interested in taking part in ProWein under the Wines of Canada brand…[We] ended up with two: Benjamin Bridge and Domaine de Grand Pré.

Benjamin Bridge Winery (BB) is located in the Gaspereau Valley. It is described at winesofnovascotia.ca as, Nova Scotia’s ultra premium sparkling wine house. Ashley McConnell-Gordon, Benjamin Bridge’s vice president explained the origin of the description. “Since 2000, we have been working with a leading team of international winemakers to produce world-class Méthode Classique sparkling wines. These innovative sparkling wines display the hallmarks of classic prestige cuvées from Champagne with a Nova Scotia signature.”

When told about the ProWein opportunity, Ms. Gordon saw a perfect match to BB’s vision of their future.

“We have an export plan for our winery,” Ms. Gordon explained. “that is focused on our traditional method sparklings, as well as select still wines, namely Nova 7. These products are already available across Canada and Japan and we anticipate the United Kingdom and other Asian markets in 2016.”

Nova Scotia’s other ProWein participant, Domaine de Grand Pre is now in the hands of Hanspeter Stutz, a Swiss business man who bought the estate in 1993. Hanspeter’s son Jurg studied grape growing and wine making at the highly respected Technische Hochschule in Waedenswil, Switzerland, where he graduated with a degree as an Oenologist. Domaine de Grand Pre is now producing wines from 100 percent Nova Scotia grown grapes that represent the Nova Scotia terroir, the combination of soil, climate, and other factors that make every corner of the earth its own unique place.

Nova Scotia’s climate is strongly influenced by the Atlantic Ocean. Spring temperatures range from 1°C/34°F to 17°C/63°F; in summer from 14°C/57°F to 28°C/82°F; in autumn about 5°C/41°F to 20°C/68°F; and in winter about −9°C/16°F to 0°C/32°F.

The growing season in Nova Scotia ranges from 100 to 200 days, with a well-distributed pattern of high rainfall of about 900mm/35in a year inland, and over 1500mm/59in a year on the coast. Typically in Nova Scotia, there is 400-500mm/15-20in of precipitation distributed evenly during the growing season. This high precipitation also means a higher frequency of storms than anywhere else in Canada. Precipitation is slightly greater in late fall and early winter because of the more frequent and intense storm activity.

These conditions combine with Atlantic coastal breezes to produce the wines of the Nova Scotia terroir, often described as fresh, crisp, and bright. They are unique enough that in 2012, the region’s wine makers developed a signature wine that was given its own appellation, Tidal Bay. Tidal Bay is the first appellation assigned to Nova Scotia. The wine is an aromatic, cool climate, white wine. It is currently being produced by twelve wineries in Nova Scotia. While each is distinct from the others, all meet the Tidal Bay standards created by a team of wine makers, sommeliers, and wine experts, and each is watched closely through every step of the winemaking process to insure that it maintains the standards

Tidal Bay wines can be any combination of the approved grape varieties, but must demonstrate the distinctive taste profile that reflects the classic Nova Scotia style: lively fresh green fruit, dynamic acidity and characteristic minerality. Tidal Bay wines must also be relatively low in alcohol, no more than 11 percent.

Benjamin Bridges’ Ms. Gordon discussed the creation of the NS appellation. “Our lead wine consultant, Peter Gamble, conceived of the white wine appellation for Nova Scotia. The wineries of Nova Scotia believed that it would help elevate the region as a serious cool-climate wine producer to create a premier white wine that would embody the quintessential characteristics of Nova Scotia terroir. A Tidal Bay wine must be a still, white wine that is fresh, crisp, dryish with a bright aromatic component. There are a set of standards with permissible grape varieties, approved processing techniques, etc. A tasting panel assesses the wines blind each year.” 

WANS’s Ms. Mainguy added, “The winemakers of the Winery Association of Nova Scotia formally developed the premium white wine appellation from the 2010 vintage. 

“The development of the appellation involved the creation of strict new grape-growing and winemaking standards on a par with the world’s toughest, and the creation of an independent tasting panel to assess all wines wishing to use the ‘Tidal Bay’ designation. 

“Stylistically, the wine is a white with a bright ‘signature Nova Scotia’ aromatic component. The wines show vibrant, expressive fruit on the nose, and a refreshingly crisp palate. Nova Scotia’s very cool-climate maritime terroir is unrivaled in the world for making this type of wine.”

Hanspeter Stutz of Domaine de Grand Pre agrees. Mr. Stutz is justifiably proud of the Nova Scotia roots of his Tidal Bay wines that were selected White Wine of the Year for the 2010 Tidal Bay at the 2011 Atlantic Canadian Wine Awards, and awarded a gold medal for the 2011 Tidal Bay at the 2012 All Canadian Wine Championships. Mr. Stutz proclaimed, “we believe Nova Scotia should develop its own varieties, styles, and vineyard procedures that will thrive with our local soil and oceanic climate.”

Mr. Stutz saw the ProWein festival as an opportunity to bring to the world his message of the excellence of Nova Scotia’s wines. Referring to the festival, Mr. Stutz said, “this show was a great success for us…ProWein Germany brought us into contact with some very interesting people around the world…Canada wines are definitely on the world’s radar screen…A lot of visitors and professionals were surprised at the high quality of Canadian wine…I am sure this will be the start of a healthy export market. Our special terroir for white and sparkling wines came up many times…I was impressed with the responses to our Riesling and Tidal Bay.”

Last December, the province announced the goal of reaching 1,000 acres of vines by 2020 up from the current 632. Way back in 1986, Nova Scotia’s wine pioneer Roger Dial speculated that it would take 3,000 to 5,000 acres of vines to secure Nova Scotia’s place among the world’s wine producing regions. The pioneer’s original vision appears to have been a bit clouded. As witnessed at ProWein, Nova Scotia’s wine makers have made their mark by relying not on quantity, but quality.