Page 47 - Grapevine May-June 2020
P. 47

Around The Vineyard



                     Monitoring Fungicide Resistance

                 Sarah Lowder, a third-year doctoral candidate
               at OSU, offered a succinct analysis of the types of
               resistance exhibited by products available to con-
               trol fungus in the vineyard. “The type of re-sistance
               exhibited by DMIs (FRAC group 3 such as Rally or
               Procure) often has several muta-tions where the
               fungus becomes more tolerant of the fungicide.
               The other type of resistance can be sudden due
               to a single mutation. Products like the QoIs (FRAC
               11, such as Abound or Flint) that exhibit this resis-
               tance are often classified as ‘high resistance risk,’
               but they also are easier to monitor using modern
               approaches.”


                 Collecting samples represents a key challenge in
               testing for powdery mildew in the vineyard. “When
               doing visual scouting, not only does it take more
               time than most growers have during the season,
               we also get a lot of false detects as scouts misiden-
               tify the disease,” Lowder said.


                 To address these concerns, they tested swabbing
               a worker’s gloves in order to ascertain if this could
               be a viable way of collecting spores quickly and
               inexpensively.


                 They tested this theory by taking swabs from
               worker’s gloves using cotton swabs with a plastic
               cap. Then, they compared those swabs with data
               obtained by swabbing the leaves directly. In both
               tests, they obtained samples from the same cano-
               pies to ensure consistency in testing.

                 Their analysis of the results proved testing a swab
               from a worker’s glove produced a 96% accu-racy in
               detecting resistant powdery mildew. Additionally,
               they found that glove swabs could de-tect the
               presence of powdery mildew in a vineyard better
               than the visual scouts. Thus, these sam-ples were
               faster and more efficient than visual scouting. As
               a side note, they tested different glove materials
               and discovered that the type of glove worn by the
               workers made no difference regarding the degree
               of accuracy.


                 They also tested the efficacy of glove swabs in
               comparison to Airborne Impaction Spore Traps.

               877-892-5332                        The Grapevine • May - June 2020                                  Page 45





          Grapevine Main Pages GV050620_Layout 1-1 .indd   45                                                       4/28/20   1:21 PM
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52