Page 8 - Grapevine July-August 2019
P. 8

In The Winery
















































               excellent suitability as a red wine grape. Asexual     As part of the application, photographs or detailed
               propagation by hardwood cutting was first carried    drawings that are artistically and competently
               out in 2002 at Hugo, Minn.; subsequent asexual       executed must be included of the plant.  If color is
               propagations have shown the variety to be stable     a distinguishing characteristic of the new variety,
               and to reproduce true to type through successive     the photographs or drawings must be submitted
               generations.”                                        in color.  In some cases, the examiner may also
                                                                    require that the applicant submit specimens of the
                 Notice that the plant was first created in 1996    plant, or its flower or fruit, at a time in its stage of
               and the first asexual reproduction was carried out   growth that the examiner designates, for study and
               in 2002, yet the application for this patent was     inspection (though if the examiner requests a spec-
               not filed until 2016 and issued in 2019.  This is an   imen in the form of a bottle of finished wine, the
               important point, because plant patents are subject   request should be viewed with a bit of skepticism).
               to the requirements of 35 U.S.C. §102(a)(1), which
               provides that the applicant will not be entitled to a     As with utility patents, examination of the appli-
               patent if the claimed invention was “described in a   cation involves a comparison of the claimed inven-
               printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or oth-  tion to the “prior art” (i.e., the plants known to
               erwise available to the public before the effective   have existed before the application).  Generally,
               filing date of the claimed invention.”  In this case,   this comparison involves a search of appropriate
               twenty years elapsed between the first creation of   subclasses of the US patent classification system as
               the variety and the filing date.  In order to satisfy   well as  patent and non-patent literature databases.
               section 102, therefore, the inventor must not have   In some cases, however, an examiner will request
               described the new variety in any printed publica-    an analysis from the Agricultural Research Service,
               tion or sold the vine or made it publicly available   Horticultural Research Branch of the Department of
               during that twenty year period.                      Agriculture.  The authority for this type of request

               Page 6                            The Grapevine • July - August 2019                             877-892-5332





          Grapevine Main Pages GV070819_Layout 1-1 .indd   6                                                        6/18/19   3:20 PM
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13