Page 7 - Grapevine May-June 2019
P. 7

In The Winery



               coveries for a limited time.  In other words, it gives   protection wins, regardless of who first came up
               the patent holder a limited-term monopoly on his     with the idea.  Also, any public disclosure of your
               invention.  Generally, new machines, chemicals,      idea (such as a trade show) starts a 1-year clock to
               electronics, methods of production, and in some      file or you may lose your eligibility for patent pro-
               cases, methods of doing business, are eligible for   tection.
               patent protection.
                                                                          Copyrights Protect Creative Works
                 Ideas alone, however, are not patentable.  They
               must first be “reduced to practice,” meaning that      The authority for copyright protection stems from
               either the inventor must have actually created the   the same section of the U.S. Constitution as patent
               invention or have described it in sufficient detail   protection, discussed above.  Our founding fathers
               that someone skilled in that area could follow       recognized the valuable contribution made to soci-
               the disclosure and create it themselves.  So, one    ety by authors and artists and, therefore, sought to
               can’t get a patent on a time machine, because        encourage creative expression by providing protec-
               (at least for now) no one has figured out how to     tion for artistic works.  Examples of copyrightable
               defy the time-space continuum.  In addition, to be   materials include, books, paintings, sculptures,
               patentable, ideas must be novel, meaning that no     musical compositions, and photographs.
               one else has ever disclosed that idea before, and
               non-obvious, meaning that the idea cannot be an        Unlike inventive ideas, which are only protected
               obvious variant on someone else’s invention.         when the government issues a patent to the inven-
                                                                    tor, copyrights attach at the moment the artistic
                 Given that humans have been making wine for        work is “fixed” in a tangible medium.  So, for exam-
               thousands of years, one might think that coming      ple, if a composer develops a new musical score
               up with something novel in the winemaking pro-       in her head it isn’t protected, but the moment she
               cess would be impossible.  Not so.  In preparation   translates that tune to notes on a page or comput-
               for this article, I ran a quick search of patents    er screen, it becomes protected by copyright.  In
               containing the word “wine” in the title and got      order to enforce that copyright in court, however,
               1184 hits.  Some recent examples include U.S.        it must be registered with the U.S. Copyright Office.
               Patent No. 10,124,305 – “Agitation device for red    While it is possible to wait until an infringer comes
               wine production,” U.S. Patent No. 10,113,979         along before filing for registration, doing so can
               – “Systems, probes, and methods for dielectric       severely limit the damages that may be available to
               testing of wine in bottle,”  and U.S. Patent No.     the author of the creative work.  So, early registra-
               10,005,993 – “Combined wine fermenter and            tion is the better course.
               press.”  Improvements in any area of the wine
               industry may be patentable including: new types        In the wine industry, copyright issues often crop
               of bottles, decanters, closures, and caps; improved   up with regard to who owns the artwork contained
               methods of separating grapes from stems; new pro-    within a label or marketing material.  Generally,
               cessing equipment; improved testing procedures;      the author of a work owns the copyright.  But, if
               improved packaging; etc.  Essentially, anything that   an employee of the winery, acting within the scope
               lowers costs between the vine and the consumer,      of their employment, creates an image that the
               improves the quality of the wine, or enhances the    winery owner incorporates into its labels, that pic-
               consumer experience is worth considering for pat-    ture is considered a “work made for hire” and is
               ent protection.                                      owned by the winery.  Where disputes often arise,
                                                                    however, is if the winery hires an outside artist or
                 One word of caution, however; time is of the       a branding agency to develop the artwork.  In that
               essence.  The America Invents Act of 2011, brought   case, the winery should include language in its con-
               the U.S. in line with most other countries in being a  tract requiring assignment of all copyrights to the
               “first to file” system, meaning if two people devel-  winery for the created artistic works.
               op the same invention, the first to file for patent

               877-892-5332                       The Grapevine • May - June 2019                                Page 5





          Grapevine Main Pages GV050619_Layout 1-1 .indd   5                                                        4/16/19   12:57 PM
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12